NWO

New World Order

This is just a rough outline, as I saw it at the time. The main point it would be good for you to take away for now is that there is in fact a New World Order at work, right now, attempting to centralize, collectivize and rationalize all human life.

Your appointed leaders can and do you the term “New World Order”, but if you use it, you will be laughed at. [Con artists use the term to obfuscate and confuse. Such con artists can be identified by their talk of such things as "the Elites!", "Teutnic Death Cults!" etc., without naming names (Rothschilds, Carnegie, Rhodes, Warburgs, Blair, Gates, etc.)

The New World Order is the method by which a planned One World Government is to be achieved. Naturally there are many aspects to this New World Order, but philosophically it is essentially an interconnected  web of Materialism, Gnosticism, Judaism and Masonry; including many elements of "The New Age", the Occult, Hinduism, and so on. In a sense it is, yes, all things to all people -- whatever can be of use -- but the constant elements are Judaism and Gnostic cults.

Practically, what it means is:

The formation of a One World Cult. Other cults, religions, faiths, will be unbeliefed mostly through continuing intense propaganda, hold-outs will either be allowed to die out or they will be eliminated when "necessary". The main "offensive" cult has always been Christianity, especially Orthodox Christianity.

• The consolidation of all credit and productive capacity in the hands of a ruling oligarchy. A few trial runs and preliminary steps have been taken, such as the establishment of central banks, the creation of the US Federal Reserve,  the creation of the USSR, the IMF, the World Bank, and drives to enact global tax legislation.
• The dissilution of all nations, classes, "races", and so on, except whatever the nation of the rulers develops into. This single dominating nation will be essentially "Israel" or "Zion", but not the same Zionist entity known as "Israel" that exists today, which is merely a shell or cover for the "grunt-work" phase of New World Order. This shell may be preserved, or eliminated as circumstances develop. The ground work for this dissolution and supranational reconsolidation has taken the form of the UN, the EEC/EU, NAFTA, etc.
• While the New World Order's Hindu, New Age, Gnostic cult background is important, it is Zionism that hold everything togethr, and Zionism can only exists in association with a powerful sponsir.

John Colemn's definition, 1992, in Conspirators’ Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 30o:

“A One World Government and one-unit monetary system, under permanent non-elected hereditary oligarchists who self-select from among their numbers in the form of a feudal system as it was in the Middle Ages. In this One World entity, population will be limited by restrictions on the number of children per family, diseases, wars, famines, until 1 billion people who are useful to the ruling class, in areas which will be strictly and clearly defined, remain as the total world population.

"There will be no middle class, only rulers and the servants. All laws will be uniform under a legal system of world courts practicing the same unified code of laws, backed up by a One World Government police force and a One World unified military to enforce laws in all former countries where no national boundaries shall exist. The system will be on the basis of a welfare state; those who are obedient and subservient to the One World Government will be rewarded with the means to live; those who are rebellious will simple be starved to death or be declared outlaws, thus a target for anyone who wishes to kill them. Privately owned firearms or weapons of any kind will be prohibited.”

Practically speaking, the New World order first took concrete shape with the Frankish takeover of the Western Church. From this came, eventually, the Great Schism, "Crusades" against the Orthodox Church, the Fall of Constantinople, "Crusades" against Russia, the "Reformation", the "Enlightenment", the French Revolution, the American Revolution, the 1905 and 1917 "revolutions" against Russia, the United Nations, and so on.

To understand New World Order, it is necessary to research a number of people, ideas, institutions and events (more detailed list to follow), centering around Gnosticism, Arianism, Luciferianism, Freemasonry, Illuminati, Socialism, Communism, Fascism, Banking, Money Supply, Cecil Rhodes, the Rockefellers, and so on.

It began to take shape in its modern form in the second decade of the 2oth Century. Crude manifestations included the Armenian Genocide and the slaughter of the Romanovs, which was designed to bring an end to Russia and to the Orthodox Christian World. Further such crude manifestations include NATO's continuation of the Franks' and Nazi war against the Serbs, and recent attempts to surround Russia. Yugoslavia was the Balkan superpower, and Serbia stands in the way of Eurabia just as it formerly stood in the way of Hitler's Neuordnung. The primary goal of the Nazi New Order was world domination, and the conquest of Russia was the essential element, as it would link Japan to Germany and be used to control Eurasia. NATO objectives are he same.

The more sophisticated aspect of the New World Order was formulated by Gramsci, who founded the Italian Communist Party and the newspaper, L'Ordine Nuovo (The New Order). Gramsci envisioned the creation of a Working Class culture that would replace the dominant bourgeois culture, and subsequently infiltrate the institutions of western society in to establish Communism as the norm. His primary target, and vehicle, was the Roman Catholic Church.

Over the years, both aspects of the New Order -- the crude, blunt, forceful path, and the sophisticated, intellectual, subversive path -- became more openly international, as the New World Order.

Its proponents and agencies and useful idiots have included ever-increasing alliances between ultraliberals, neoconservatives, humanists, the United Nations, the European Union, Eurabianists, socialists, conservative socialists, liberals, secularists, neoconservatives, humanists, libertarians, the World Council of Churches, atheists, large parts of the Roman Catholic Church, Freemasons, Plutocrats, the United Nations, the ICC, the WHO, the WTO, Winston Churchill, Henry Kissinger, Eijiro Graf Coudenhove-Kalergi, Michael Gorbachov, the Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the Bushes, the Clintons, the Rockefellers, the Carnegies, Aristide Briand, Jacques Delors, Seán MacBride, every Post-WWII British Prime Minister, the vast majority of EU national "leaders" and elites, Jacob Schiff, the Habsburgs, the International Paneuropean Union, Eurocommunists, muliticulturalists, and, of course, many, many more individuals and a host of other idolatrous sub-movements that are all consciously or subconsciously part of the process of achieving NWO-OWG world domination in the service of Anti-Christ.

The primary phase was the infiltration and subjugation of the West, and the naive but bloody attempts to destroy the Church (naive because the Gates of Hell cannot prevail against it), the denigration of Christian culture, and the disintegration of the Christian World.

Now it is important to bring the rest of the world on board, especially the "Muslim World", China, and India. This has been prepared for decades now.

Western Colonialism played a large part, to the extent that, for example, all of China is currently guided by the Western atheist Jewish religion of Communism, and few Chinese "citizens" are even aware of this bizarre development.

It would seem that recently NWO-OWG promoters believe that their goals can best be achieved in the near future by a Communist-Muslim or Red-Green Alliance.

Due to generations of mental poisoning and brainwashing, many people are confused, and cannot comprehend what common cause there could be between the Communist and Muslim ideologies.

Communism is, at its core, a religion of materialism. Islam is, at its core, a religion of materialism. There is no paradox here. Religion in general is materialistic. Orthodox Christianity is not a religion, but is the Faith, the Church, the pathway to the Kingdom of God.

Islam and Communism are religions in the sense that religion is a man-made consumer good. For Communists, the highest humanist aspiration is to be a cog in the wheel of the production of consumer goods. The goal is world domination and the cultivation of the hive.

The Mohammadan objective is also colonization, world domination, and exploitation. Of course Communism has a greater ideological and religious component than Islam, and Islam is much more materialistic than Communism, but they share the goal of the Anti-Christ eschaton.

Communism is more likely to apply ideological persuasion and the kind of Satanic temptations offered to Christ in the desert. For Communists, this is preferable to outright military conquest. Even in Communist-conquered territories, it is considered more ethical to brainwash the host population into loving its slavery than to have to apply more physically coercive techniques. It is necessary that the slave learn to view the elite master class as representing his essential interests. It is equally necessary that the elite master class delude itself into believing that it represents the masses and is always acting in the best interests of the hive.

Islamic contagion applies the same persuasive techniques, when necessary, but ultimately it is a religion of brute conquest and subjugation. Mohammad, guided by Satan, provided the initial Promethian spark, but their devotees soon discovered that in order to appeal to ghazis, feed the ummah, and effectively expand the Dar al-Islam, it was necessary to make sure that the masters and slaves both understood and maintained their relative positions.

One example of Muslim materialism is that for Muslims the main role of women is to bear children, who will target the Dar al-Harb – The Not-Yet-Muslim House of War — take advantages of whatever weaknesses prevail in that particular territory, invade the host, plant their seed, and are one way or another colonize the host body.

This is why Islam Colonizes The Womb.

Some aspects of the spread of Islam are:

(a) The way in which it colonizes the womb
(b) The way in which it leaves its genetic stain wherever it goes

Muslim men can have four wives, of any religion, but Muslim women are absolutely forbidden to mate (or even, strictly-speaking, to socialize) with non-Muslim men. Children of Muslims are automatically considered Muslim (e.g.Barack bin Barack Hussein Obama-Soetoro), and apostasy is punishable by death.

In other words:

(1) Muslim sperm can go anywhere
(2) Muslim wombs and their products belong to Islam forever
(3) Once Muslim, forever Muslim

“Once Muslim, Forever Muslim”: This same rule applies to territory, such as Portugal, Spain, Israel, East Timor, Bali, Mindanao. Islam divides the world into The House of Peace (Islam) and The House of War (”Infidel” territory) .

In this sense, Islam has so far proven more effective at achieving the goal of Anti-Christ than Communism has. However, Communism still plays a significant role in infiltrating host societies and laying the groundwork for world government.

Communism’s main purpose at this point in time seems to be as a method for Anti-Christ to prepare the way for Mohamaddan impregnation. Examples of this method in action can be seen in the effective Communist exploitation of the weaknesses of secular, liberal ad or conservative society and the subsequent neoconservative-neoliberal (its name is legion) infiltration. Libertarianism and aggressive secularism are other self-regarding avenues that have proven effective in weakening host societies in order to to prepare them for subsequent Communist-Muslim Red-Green implantation.

Naturally, all of these movements and techniques are based on humanist delusions. In every case the true believer clings irrationally to the belief that rational world domination can be achieved, in spite of all evidence to the contrary.

Any sensible person can see that Islam, Humanism and Communism fail everywhere they become the guiding principles for human society. But the true believers, even when they concede any hint of failure, just say that that is only because their ideology was insufficiently implemented, and therefore all that is necessary is to try even harder next time.

“All will be forgiven!” “Long live the dictatorship of the proletariat” “Arbeit macht frei!” “Allahu Akbar!” “Yes We Can!” they shout.

The Enlightenment, The Solution:

Christ, Christ Pantocrator, God, God the Son, I AM, Immanuel, Jesus, Jesus Christ, Jesus of Nazareth, Light of Light, Our Passover, The Alpha and the Omega, The Amen, The Annointed One, The Author and Perfecter of Faith, The Beginning and the End, The Bread of Life, The Bright and Morning Star, The Deliverer, The Everlasting Father, The Faithful Witness, The First and the Last, The Firstborn of the Dead, The Good Shepherd, The Heir of all Things, The Holy and Righteous One, The Holy One of God, The Holy Servant, The King of Kings, The Lamb of God who takes away the sin of the world, The Lion of the Tribe of Judah, The Lord of Lords, The Mediator, The Messenger and High Priest of our confession, The Messiah, The Prince of Peace, The Prophet, The Redeemer, The Resurrection and the Life, The Root and the Offspring of David, The Ruler of the Kings of the Earth, The Savior of the Universe, The Sheep's Door, The Shepherd, The Son of God, The Son of Man, The Son of the Most High, The True Light, The True Vine, The Truth, The Way, The Witness

Genesis:

Now the whole earth had one language and one speech. And it came to pass, as they journeyed from the east, that they found a plain in the land of Shinar, and they dwelt there. Then they said to one another, "Come, let us make bricks and bake them thoroughly." They had brick for stone, and they had asphalt for mortar. And they said, "Come, let us build ourselves a city, and a tower whose top is in the heavens; let us make a name for ourselves, lest we be scattered abroad over the face of the whole earth."

But the LORD came down to see the city and the tower which the sons of men had built. And the LORD said, "Indeed the people are one and they all have one language, and this is what they begin to do; now nothing that they propose to do will be withheld from them. Come, let Us go down and there confuse their language, that they may not understand one another's speech." So the LORD scattered them abroad from there over the face of all the earth, and they ceased building the city. Therefore its name is called Babel, because there the LORD confused the language of all the earth; and from there the LORD scattered them abroad over the face of all the earth.

Saint Matthew:

Then Jesus was led up by the Spirit into the wilderness to be tempted by the devil [Diablos, The Slanderer]. And when He had fasted forty days and forty nights, afterward He was hungry. Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, “If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.”

But He answered and said, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceeds from the mouth of God.’”

Then the devil took Him up into the holy city, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, “If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down. For it is written: ‘He shall give His angels charge over you,’ and, ‘In their hands they shall bear you up, Lest you dash your foot against a stone.’”

Jesus said to him, “It is written again, ‘You shall not tempt the LORD your God.’”

Again, the devil took Him up on an exceedingly high mountain, and showed Him all the kingdoms of the world and their glory. And he said to Him, “All these things I will give You if You will fall down and worship me.”

Then Jesus said to him, “Away with you, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve.’”

Then the devil left Him, and behold, angels came and ministered to Him.

Saint Mark:

Immediately the Spirit drove Him into the wilderness. And He was there in the wilderness forty days, tempted by Satan, and was with the wild beasts; and the angels ministered to Him.

Saint Luke:

Then Jesus, being filled with the Holy Spirit, returned from the Jordan and was led by the Spirit into the wilderness, being tempted for forty days by the devil. And in those days He ate nothing, and afterward, when they had ended, He was hungry.

And the devil said to Him, “If You are the Son of God, command this stone to become bread.”

But Jesus answered him, saying, “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word of God.’”

Then the devil, taking Him up on a high mountain, showed Him all the kingdoms of the world in a moment of time.

And the devil said to Him, “All this authority I will give You, and their glory; for this has been delivered to me, and I give it to whomever I wish. Therefore, if You will worship before me, all will be Yours.”

And Jesus answered and said to him, “Get behind Me, Satan! For it is written, ‘You shall worship the LORD your God, and Him only you shall serve.’”

Then he brought Him to Jerusalem, set Him on the pinnacle of the temple, and said to Him, “If You are the Son of God, throw Yourself down from here. For it is written: ‘He shall give His angels charge over you, To keep you,’ and, ‘In their hands they shall bear you up, Lest you dash your foot against a stone.’”

And Jesus answered and said to him, “It has been said, ‘You shall not tempt the LORD your God.’”

Now when the devil had ended every temptation, he departed from Him until an opportune time.

Jeremy Bentham:

The groundwork of mischief is this. A man fancies that he knows what is best for other men; that he is better acquainted with their sources of happiness than they can be; that he has more appropriate knowledge, and having more power, that he can turn his knowledge to good account on their behalf. He has formed his own estimate of good he is thoroughly persuaded that such and such a thing is good, and being good, he will compel others to receive and to adopt it, because it is good, and because he knows, from experience, it is so.

Yet despotism never takes a worse shape than when it comes in the guise of benevolence; and is never more dangerous than when it acts under the impression that it represents beneficence.

Bob Dylan:

Counterfeit philosophies have polluted all of your thoughts. Karl Marx has got you by the throat, Henry Kissinger’s got you tied up in knots. When you gonna wake up? When you gonna wake up? When you gonna wake up and strengthen the things that remain?

Henry Kissinger:

• There is a need for a New World Order, but it has different characteristics in different parts of the world. … We have to bring about, together with other countries, a different consciousness of what a World Order is. Now you have, on the one extreme, globalization, in which the nation is weakened. On the other extreme you have religion. … At the end of this [Bush] administration, with all its turmoil, and at the beginning of the next [Obama], we might actually witness the creation of a New Order…even in the Islamic World.
• The president-elect [Obama] is coming into office at a moment when there is upheaval in many parts of the world simultaneously. You have India, Pakistan; you have the jihadist movement. So he can’t really say there is one problem, that it’s the most important one. But he can give new impetus to American foreign policy partly because the reception of him is so extraordinary around the world. His task will be to develop an overall strategy for America in this period when, really, a New World Order can be created. It’s a great opportunity, it isn’t just a crisis.
• The alternative to a new international order is chaos. … The extraordinary impact of the president-elect [Obama] on the imagination of humanity is an important element in shaping a New World Order.
• The New World Order cannot happen without U.S. participation, as we are the most significant single component. Yes, there will be a New World Order, and it will force the United States to change its perceptions.
  

Barack Obama:

We’ve got to win over hearts and minds. We’ve got to invest in countries that have no educational infrastructure, have no means for young people to get ahead. We’ve got to give them a stake in the kind of World Order that I think all of us would like to see.

George H.W. Bush:

• Out of these troubled times, a New World Order can emerge under a United Nations that performs as envisioned by its founders.Perhaps the world order of the future will truly be a family of nations.
  
• We have before us the opportunity to forge for ourselves and for future generations a New World Order.
  
• When we are successful, and we will be, we have a real chance at this new world order, an order in which a credible United Nations can use its peacekeeping role to fulfill the promise and vision of the U.N.’s founders.
  
• What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea — a New World Order.
  
• The world can seize the opportunity to fulfill the long-held promise of a New World Order.

David Rockefeller:

We are on the verge of a global transformation. All we need is the right major crisis and the nations will accept the New World Order.

Alexander King and Bertrand Schneider:

In searching for the new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. In their totality and in their interactions these phenomena do constitute a common threat which demands the solidarity of all peoples. But in designating them as the enemy, we fall into the trap about which we have already warned, namely mistaking symptoms for cause. All these dangers are caused by human intervention and it is only through changing attitudes and behaviors that they can be overcome. The real enemy, then, is humanity itself. ["The First Global Revolution," Club of Rome, 1991, p. 75]

David Rockefeller, Trilateral Commission, 1991:

We are grateful to the Washington Post, the New York Times, Time magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected the promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world-government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the National auto determination practiced in past centuries.

Richard Nikolaus Eijiro 栄次郎 Graf Coudenhove-Kalergi, co-founder of The Pan-European Movement:

The man of the future will be of mixed race. Today’s races and classes will gradually disappear owing to the vanishing of space, time, and prejudice. The Eurasian-Negroid race of the future, similar in its appearance to the Ancient Egyptians, will replace the diversity of peoples with a diversity of individuals.

…

Instead of destroying European Jewry, Europe, against its own will, refined and educated this people into a future leader-nation through this artificial selection process. No wonder that this people, that escaped Ghetto-Prison, developed into a spiritual nobility of Europe. Therefore a gracious Providence provided Europe with a new race of nobility through spiritual grace. This happened at the moment when Europe’s feudal aristocracy became dilapidated, and thanks to Jewish emancipation.

[Praktischer Idealismus (Practical Idealism), Wien und Leipzig, 1925, pp. 20, 23, 50.]

[See also ePanEurope]

Mikhael Gorbachev:

For a new type of progress throughout the world to become a reality, everyone must change. Tolerance is the alpha and omega of a New World Order.

Georgian President Mikhail Saakashvili:

We are also fighting for world peace and we are also fighting for a future World Order.

Bill Clinton:

After 1989 President Bush said a phrase that I often use myself, that is, we needed a New World Order.

Gordon Brown:

We could view the threats and challenges we face today as the difficult birth-pangs of a New Global Order – and our task now as nothing less than making the transition through a new internationalism to the benefits of an expanding global society – not muddling through as pessimists but making the necessary adjustment to a better future and setting the new rules for this New Global Order.

Tony Blair:

There is a New World Order, like it or not, and we need to decide our place in it. And of course it means difficult choices, especially when there is the possibility of military engagement. Every time I have pursued a policy of military engagement since becoming Prime Minister I have faced strong opposition, interestingly not so much from the traditional left as from parts of the right.

Turkish President Abdullah Gül:

“What we have to do is, instead of unilateral actions, act all together, make common decisions and have consultations with the world. A New World Order, if I can say it, should emerge.”

Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad:

A New World Order based on new ideas is needed. Tyrannical regimes will not last forever and they will reach their end sooner or later. Any civilization or empire that wants to impose its ideas on others through the use of force will reach its end in the near future. The defeat of the Zionist Entity [n Gaza] is the beginning of a new order in the world. Now they are in disarray and new developments are unfolding.

Obama + Brzezinski

“In 1973 the Trilateral Commission was founded by David Rockefeller, Chase Manhattan Bank chairman, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Carter’s national security advisor, and other like-minded ‘eminent private citizens (like George H.W.Bush)’ Some 300 members (up from about 200 members in 1973) are drawn from international business and banking, government, academia, media, and conservative labor. The Commission’s purpose is to engineer an enduring partnership among the ruling classes of North American, Western Europe, and Japan—hence the term ‘trilateral’—in order to safeguard the interests of Western capitalism in an explosive world. The private Trilateral Commission is attempting to mold public policy and construct a framework for international stability in the coming decades. Throughout this book, ‘trilateralism’ refers to the doctrine of world order advanced by the Commission” [Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management, Edited by Holly Sklar, South End Press, 1980].

“For Brzezinski, 79, support for Obama means support for a radical change in direction of American foreign policy.” [MSNBC]

Gordon Brown, Washington, 2009,03.03:

Look, there is the possibility in the next few months of a Global New Deal that will involve all the countries of the world.

There is the possibility of all the different countries of the world coming together.

There is the possibility of the international institutions for the first time being reformed in such a way that they can do the job that people want them to do.

I think there is a general understanding, whether you talk to China, whether you talk to the European Union or you talk to our great friends here in America, that we need to show that the world can come together.

The special relationship is going global

By British Prime Minister Gordon Brown, The Times, 2009.03.01

Historians will look back and say this was no ordinary time but a defining moment: an unprecedented period of global change, and a time when one chapter ended and another began.

The scale and the speed of the global banking crisis has at times been almost overwhelming, and I know that in countries everywhere people who rely on their banks for savings have been feeling powerless and afraid. But it is when times become harder and challenges greater that across the world countries must show vision, leadership and courage – and, while we can do a great deal nationally, we can do even more working together internationally.

So now is the time for leaders of every country in the world to work together to agree the action that will see us through the current crisis and ensure we come out stronger. And there is no international partnership in recent history that has served the world better than the special relationship between Britain and the United States.

It is a relationship that has endured and flourished because it is based not simply on our shared history but on the enduring values that bind us together – our countries founded upon liberty, our histories forged through democracy and an unshakeable belief in the power of enterprise and opportunity.

But if it reflects our values and our histories, this special relationship is also a partnership of purpose, renewed by every generation to reflect the challenges we face. In the 1940s it found its full force defeating fascism and building the postwar international order; in the cold war era we fought the growth of nuclear weapons and when the Berlin Wall fell we saw the end of communism. In this new century, since the horrors visited on America in 2001, we have worked in partnership to defeat terrorism.

Now, in this generation, we must renew our work together once again. A new set of challenges faces the whole world, which summons forth the need for a partnership of purpose that must involve the whole world. Rebuilding global financial stability is a global challenge that needs global solutions. However, financial instability is but one of the challenges that globalisation brings. Our task in working together is to secure a high-growth, low-carbon recovery by taking seriously the global challenge of climate change. And our efforts must be to work for a more stable world where we defeat not only global terrorism but global poverty, hunger and disease.

Globalisation has brought great advances, lifting millions out of poverty as they reap the benefits of economic growth and trade. But it has also brought new insecurities, as this – the first truly global financial crisis – underlines. Globalisation is not an option, it is a fact, so the question is whether we manage it well or badly.

I believe there is no challenge so great or so difficult that it cannot be overcome by America, Britain and the world working together. That is why President Obama and I will discuss this week a Global New Deal, whose impact can stretch from the villages of Africa to reforming the financial institutions of London and New York–and giving security to the hard-working families in every country.

I see this Global New Deal as an agreement that every continent injects resources into its economy. I believe that central to this new investment is that every country backs a green recovery for the future, that every country that wishes to participate in the international financial system agrees common principles for financial regulation, coordinated internationally, and changes to their own banking system that will bring us shared prosperity once again. And that, together, we must agree to reform the mandate and governance of global institutions to recognise the changing shape of the world economy and the emergence of new players.

It is a Global New Deal that will lay the foundations not just for a sustainable economic recovery but for a genuinely new era of international partnership in which all countries have a part to play. This programme of internationally coordinated actions includes six elements:

• First, universal action to prevent the crisis spreading, to stimulate the global economy and to help reduce the severity and length of the global recession.
• Second, action to kick-start lending so that families and businesses can borrow again.
• Third, all countries renouncing protectionism, with a transparent mechanism to monitor commitments.
• Fourth, reform of international regulation to close regulatory gaps so shadow banking systems have nowhere to hide.
• Fifth, reform of our international financial institutions and the creation of an international early warning system.
• And last, coordinated international action to build tomorrow today - putting the world economy on an economically, environmentally and socially sustainable path towards future growth and recovery.

I have always been an Anti-Christ Atlanticist [even though I have given the United Kingdom to the EU in chains] and a great admirer of the American spirit of enterprise and national purpose. I have visited America many times and have many friends there, and as prime minister I want to do more to strengthen even further our relationship with America.

Winston Churchill described the joint inheritance of Britain and America as not just a shared history but a shared belief in the great principles of freedom and the rights of man – what Barack Obama has described as the enduring power of our ideals – democracy, liberty, opportunity and unyielding hope. Britain and America may be separated by the thousands of miles of the Atlantic, but we are united by shared values that can never be broken. And as America stands at its own dawn of hope, I want that hope to be fulfilled through us all coming together to shape the 21st century as the first century of a truly global society.

Winston Churchill, Zurich, 19 September 1946:

I was very glad to read in the newspapers two days ago that my friend President Truman had expressed his interest and sympathy with this great design. There is no reason why a regional organization of Europe should in any way conflict with the world organization of the United Nations. On the contrary, I believe that the larger synthesis will only survive if it is founded upon coherent natural groupings.
…
There must be what Mr. Gladstone many years ago called “a blessed act of oblivion”. We must all turn our backs upon the horrors of the past. We must look to the future.
…
The first step in the re-creation of the European Family must be a partnership between France and Germany. … The structure of the United States of Europe, if well and truly built, will be such as to make the material strength of a single state less important. Small nations will count as much as large ones and gain their honour by their contribution to the common cause.
…
But I must give you a warning. Time may be short. … If we are to form the United States of Europe, or whatever name it may take, we must begin now.
…
Our constant aim must be to build and fortify the strength of the United Nations Organization. Under and within that world concept we must re-create the European Family in a regional structure called, it may be, the United States of Europe. And the first practical step would be to form a Council of Europe. If at first all the States of Europe are not wiliing or able to join the Union, we must nevertheless proceed to assemble and combine those who will and those who can. The salvation of the common people of every race and of every land from war or servitude must be established on solid foundations and must be guarded by the readiness of all men and women to die rather than submit to tyranny.

The Birth of a Global Nation

By Strobe Talbott, TIME, 1992, 07.20

[Talbott was Clinton's Ambassador-at-Large and a Special Adviser to the Secretary of State; currently president of the Brookings Institution in Washington]

Unity will prevail over disunity, integration over disintegration. Within the next hundred years, nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. A phrase briefly fashionable in the mid-20th century — “citizen of the world” — will have assumed real meaning by the end of the 21st century.

All countries are basically social arrangements, accommodations to changing circumstances. No matter how permanent and even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary. Through the ages, there has been an overall trend toward larger units claiming sovereignty and paradoxically, a gradual diminution of how much true sovereignty any one country actually has.

In the 18th century the Enlightenment — represented by Rousseau in France, Hume in Scotland, Kant in Germany, Paine and Jefferson in the U.S. — gave rise to the idea that all human beings are born equal and should, as citizens, enjoy certain basic liberties and rights, including that of choosing their leaders. Once there was a universal ideology to govern the conduct of nation toward their own people, it was more reasonable to imagine a compact governing nations’ behavior toward one another.

In 1795 Kant advocated a “peaceful league of democracies.” But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.
Einstein, Ghandi, Toynbee and Camus all favored giving primacy to interests higher than those of the nation. So, finally, did the statesmen.

A new species of ideology — expansionist totalitarianism — as perpetrated by the Nazis and the Soviets threatened the very idea of democracy and divided the world. The advocacy of any kind of world government became highly suspect. At the same time, however, Stalin’s conquest of Eastern Europe spurred the Western democracies to form NATO, history’s most ambitious, enduring and successful exercise in collective security. The cold war also saw the European Community pioneer the kind of regional cohesion that may pave the way for globalism.

Meanwhile, the free world formed multilateral financial institutions that depend on member states’ willingness to give up a degree of sovereignty. The International Monetary Fund can virtually dictate fiscal policies, even including how much tax a government should levy on its citizens. The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade regulates how much a nation can charge on imports. These organizations can be seen as the protoministries of trade, finance and development for a united world.

The internal affairs of a nation used to be off limits to the world community. Now the principal of “humanitarian intervention” is gaining acceptance.

Globalization has also contributed to the spread of terrorism, drug trafficking, AIDS and environmental degradation. But because those threats are more than any one nation can cope with on its own, they constitute an incentive for international cooperation.

Last month’s Earth Summit in Rio signified the participants’ acceptance of what Maurice Strong, the main impresario of the event, called “the transcending sovereignty of nature”: since the by-products of industrial civilization cross borders, so must the authority to deal with them.

Collective action on a global scale will be easier to achieve in a world already knit together by cables and air-waves.

National self-assertiveness in the West can be mighty ugly, especially in its more extreme Irish and Basque versions. But when Scots, Quebecois, Catalans and Bretons talk separatism, they are, in the main, actually renegotiating their ties to London, Ottawa, Madrid and Paris.
They are the disputatious representatives of a larger, basically positive phenomenon: a devolution of power not only upward toward supranational bodies and outward toward commonwealths and common markets, but also downward toward freer, more autonomous units of administration that permit distinct societies to preserve their cultural identities and govern themselves as much as possible.

That American buzzward empowerment — and the European one, subsidiary — is being defined locally, regionally and globally all at the same time.

The best mechanism for democracy, whether at the level of the multinational state or that of the planet as a whole, is not an all-powerful Leviathan or centralized superstate, but a federation, a union of separate states that allocate certain powers to a central government while retaining many others for themselves.
Federalism has already proved the most successful of all political experiments, and organizations like the World Federalist Association have for decades advocated it as the basis for global government.

Federalism is largely an American invention. The U.S. is still the best example of a multinational federal state. If that model does indeed work globally, it would be the logical extension of the Founding Fathers’ wisdom, therefore a special source of pride for a World Government’s American constituents.

Satanic Names

Abaddon (Apollyon)

Revelation 9:11 “And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon.”

Accuser of the Brethren

Revelation 12:10 “Then I heard a loud voice saying in heaven, ‘Now salvation, and strength, and the kingdom of our God, and the power of His Christ have come, for the accuser of our brethren, who accused them before our God day and night, has been cast down.’”

(See also Job 1 & 2)

Adversary

1 Peter 5:8 “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.”

Angel of Light

2 Corinthians 11:14 “And no wonder! For Satan himself transforms himself into an angel of light.”

Anointed Cherub

Ezekiel 28:14 “You were the anointed cherub who covers; I established you; You were on the holy mountain of God; You walked back and forth in the midst of fiery stones.”

Beelzebub

Matthew 12:24 “Now when the Pharisees heard it they said, ‘This fellow does not cast out demons except by Beelzebub, the ruler of the demons.’” (See also Matthew 10:25)

Belial

2 Corinthians 6:15 “And what accord has Christ with Belial? Or what part has a believer with an unbeliever?”

Corrupter of Minds

2 Corinthians 11:3 “But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.”

Devil

Revelation 12:9 “So the great dragon was cast out, that serpent of old, called the Devil and Satan, who deceives the whole world; he was cast to the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.”

Dragon

Revelation 12:3 “And another sign appeared in heaven: behold, a great, fiery red dragon having seven heads and ten horns, and seven diadems on his heads.” (See also Revelation 20:2-7 and Isaiah 14:29)

Enemy

Matthew 13:39 “The enemy who sowed them is the devil, the harvest is the end of the age, and the reapers are the angels.”

God of this World

2 Corinthians 4:4 “whose minds the god of this age has blinded, who do not believe, lest the light of the gospel of the glory of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine on them.”

King

Revelation 9:11 “And they had as king over them the angel of the bottomless pit, whose name in Hebrew is Abaddon, but in Greek he has the name Apollyon.” (See also Ephesians 6:12)

Liar

John 8:44 “You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.”

Lucifer

Isaiah 14:12 “How you are fallen from heaven, O Lucifer, son of the morning! How you are cut down to the ground, You who weakened the nations!”

Murderer

John 8:44 “You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you want to do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and does not stand in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaks a lie, he speaks from his own resources, for he is a liar and the father of it.”

Oppressor

Acts 10:38 “how God anointed Jesus of Nazareth with the Holy Spirit and with power, who went about doing good and healing all who were oppressed by the devil, for God was with Him.”

Prince of the Air

Ephesians 2:2 “in which you once walked according to the course of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who now works in the sons of disobedience,”

Prince of Darkness

Ephesians 6:12 “For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places.”

Prince of this World

John 12:31 “Now is the judgment of this world; now the ruler of this world will be cast out.” (See also John 16:11)

Roaring Lion

1 Peter 5:8 “Be sober, be vigilant; because your adversary the devil walks about like a roaring lion, seeking whom he may devour.”

Satan

Job 1:6 “Now there was a day when the sons of God came to present themselves before the LORD, and Satan also came among them.” (See also Revelation 12:9)

Serpent

2 Corinthians 11:3 “But I fear, lest somehow, as the serpent deceived Eve by his craftiness, so your minds may be corrupted from the simplicity that is in Christ.” (See also Genesis 3:1, Revelation 12:9 and Genesis 3:14)

Tempter

Matthew 4:3 “Now when the tempter came to Him, he said, ‘If You are the Son of God, command that these stones become bread.’”

Thief

John 10:10 “The thief does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.”

Wicked One

Matthew 13:19 “When anyone hears the word of the kingdom, and does not understand it, then the wicked one comes and snatches away what was sown in his heart. This is he who received seed by the wayside.”

Suggested searches, in order to understand the NWO mindset:

• Anti-Christ
• Arianism
• Atheism, Atheists
• Christ, Orthodox Christianity, Orthodox Christian, Orthodoxy
• Communist, Communist, International Communism, Marx, Marxism, Communist Manifesto
• Communist-Muslim Alliance, Green-Red Alliance, Red-Green Alliance, Socialist-Muslim Alliance, Muslim-Socialist Alliance, Muslim-Communist Alliance
• Conquest, Domination, Exploitation, Colonization
• Conservative Socialists
• Contagion, Infestation, Infiltration,
• Darwin
• EU, Eurabia, European Union, The European Union, The United States of Europe, United States of Europe
• Faith
• Freud
• Globalism, Globalists
• Gog and Magog, Land of the Gog and Magog
• Gnosticism
• Humanism, Humanist, Humanists
• Islam, Mohammedanism, Muslim, Muslims, Jihad, Sharia, Dawa, Dawah, Dar al-Dawah, House of Acceptance, Dar al-Harb, Dar al-Islam, The House of Peace, The House of War, دار الإسلام , دار الحرب , Dhimmi, Dhimmitude, Koran, Quran
• Liberalism, Liberals
• Libertarianism, Libertarians
• Materialism
• Merovingians, Charlemagne, Carolingians
• NATO
• Neo-Conservatism, Neo-Conservative, Neo-Conservatives, Neoconservatism, Neoconservative, Neoconservatives
• Neo-Liberalism, Neoliberalism
• New World Order, NWO, One World Government, New Global Order
• One World Religion, Ecumenism
• Religion, Religion vs Faith, Cult, New Age
• Satan, Satanism
• Secularism, Secularist, Secularists
• Socialism, Socialist, Socialists
• Ultraliberalism, Ultraliberals
• UN, United Nations, The United Nations
• United States of Allahu Akbar
• Misc.: Sayyid Haydar Amuli, Robert Henry Brand, Lionel George Curtis, Anglo-American union, Cecil Rhodes, Round Table, Chatham Group, Royal Institute of International Affairs, Council on Foreign Relations, Thomas W. Lamont, Isaiah Bowman, George Louis Beer, Whitney H. Shepardson, Robert Cecil, Hotel Majestic meeting, Frank Aydetlotte, Whitney Shepardson, Jerome D. Green, Erwin D. Canham, Walter Lippman, Rothschilds, Club of Rome, Bilderberg, Rumsfeld, Cheney, Jacob Schiff, Warburgs, Kuhn-Loeb, Trotsky, Sakharov, Gorbachev, Fabian Socialists, Webbs, HG Wells, GB Shwaw, Leonard Woolf, Comintern, Open Conspiracy, George Soros, Open Society, Ben Gurion, ACLU, Neoconservative, National Review, Miliband, Lasky, Red Army, Irving Kristol, William Kristol, Charles Krauthammer, Joshua Muravchik, Paul Wolfowitz, Richard Perle, Project for a New American Century, Elliot Abrams, Zalmay Khalilzad, Rockefellers, Lehman, AIC,  Jeckyll Island, Aldridge, Federal Reserve Act 1913, Revenue Act 1913, WA Harriman, House of Morgan, DuPonts, Peter George Peterson, Stephen A Schwartzman, Skull and Bones, Blackstone, Goldman Sachs, Klaus Schwab, Scientism, Malthusianism, Darwinism, Social Darwinism, Eugenics, Multicultarlism, Open Borders, Paris Peace Con Versailles, League of Nations, UN, EU, IMF, World Bank, World Economic Forum, G7, G8, G20, Credit Lyonnais Bank, European Currency Unit Banking Association (ECUBA)

A CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY OF THE NEW WORLD ORDER

By D.L Cuddy

[Written in 1996, dealing mostly with the USA. Cuddy begins in 1912. Actually it goes waaay back, but this is a good introduction if you're still suffering from the delusion that the Republicans and Democrats are different parties.]

1912: Colonel Edward M. House, a close advisor of President Woodrow Wilson, publishes Phillip Dru: Administrator in which he promotes “socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx.”

1913: The Federal Reserve (neither federal nor a reserve) is created. It was planned at a secret meeting in 1910 on Jekyl Island, Georgia by a group of bankers and politicians, including Col. House. This transferred the power to create money from the American government to a private group of bankers. It is probably the largest generator of debt in the world.

May 30, 1919: Prominent British and American personalities establish the Royal Institute of International Affairs in England and the Institute of International Affairs in the U.S. at a meeting arranged by Col. House attended by various Fabian socialists, including noted economist John Maynard Keynes. Two years later, Col. House reorganizes the Institute of International Affairs into the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR).

December 15, 1922: The CFR endorses World Government in its magazine Foreign Affairs. Author Philip Kerr, states:

“Obviously there is going to be no peace or prosperity for mankind as long as [the earth] remains divided into 50 or 60 independent states until some kind of international system is created… The real problem today is that of the world government.”

1928: The Open Conspiracy: Blue Prints for a World Revolution by H.G. Wells is published. A former Fabian Socialist, Wells writes:

“The political world of the … Open Conspiracy must weaken, efface, incorporate and supersede existing governments… The Open Conspiracy is the natural inheritor of socialist and communist enthusiasms; it may be in control of Moscow before it is in control of New York… The character of the Open Conspiracy will now be plainly displayed… It will be a world religion.”

1931: Students at the Lenin School of Political Warfare in Moscow are taught:

“One day we shall start to spread the most theatrical peace movement the world has ever seen. The capitalist countries, stupid and decadent … will fall into the trap offered by the possibility of making new friends. Our day will come in 30 years or so… The bourgeoisie must be lulled into a false sense of security.”

1931: In a speech to the Institute for the Study of International Affairs at Copenhagen) historian Arnold Toyee said:

“We are at present working discreetly with all our might to wrest this mysterious force called sovereignty out of the clutches of the local nation states of the world. All the time we are denying with our lips what we are doing with our hands….”

1932: New books are published urging World Order:

Toward Soviet America by William Z. Foster. Head of the Communist Party USA, Foster indicates that a National Department of Education would be one of the means used to develop a new socialist society in the U.S.

The New World Order by F.S. Marvin, describing the League of Nations as the first attempt at a New World Order. Marvin says, “nationality must rank below the claims of mankind as a whole.”

Dare the School Build a New Social Order? is published. Educator author George Counts asserts that:

“… the teachers should deliberately reach for power and then make the most of their conquest” in order to “influence the social attitudes, ideals and behavior of the coming generation… The growth of science and technology has carried us into a new age where ignorance must be replaced by knowledge, competition by cooperation, trust in Providence by careful planning and private capitalism by some form of social economy.”

1933: The first Humanist Manifesto is published. Co-author John Dewey, the noted philosopher and educator, calls for a synthesizing of all religions and “a socialized and cooperative economic order.”

Co-signer C.F. Potter said in 1930:

“Education is thus a most powerful ally of humanism, and every American public school is a school of humanism. What can the theistic Sunday schools, meeting for an hour once a week, teaching only a fraction of the children, do to stem the tide of a five-day program of humanistic teaching?”

1933: The Shape of Things to Come by H.G. Wells is published. Wells predicts a second world war around 1940, originating from a German-Polish dispute. After 1945 there would be an increasing lack of public safety in “criminally infected” areas. The plan for the “Modern World-State” would succeed on its third attempt (about 1980), and come out of something that occurred in Basra, Iraq. The book also states,

“Although world government had been plainly coming for some years, although it had been endlessly feared and murmured against, it found no opposition prepared anywhere.”

1934: The Externalization of the Hierarchy by Alice A. Bailey is published. Bailey is an occultist, whose works are channeled from a spirit guide, the Tibetan Master [demon spirit] Djwahl Kuhl. Bailey uses the phrase “points of light” in connection with a “New Group of World Servers” and claims that 1934 marks the beginning of “the organizing of the men and women… group work of a new order… [with] progress defined by service… the world of the Brotherhood… the Forces of Light… [and] out of the spoliation of all existing culture and civilization, the new world order must be built.”

The book is published by the Lucis Trust, incorporated originally in New York as the Lucifer Publishing Company. Lucis Trust is a United Nations NGO and has been a major player at the recent U.N. summits. Later Assistant Secretary General of the U.N. Robert Mueller would credit the creation of his World Core Curriculum for education to the underlying teachings of Djwahl Kuhl via Alice Bailey’s writings on the subject.

1932: Plan for Peace by American Birth Control League founder Margaret Sanger (1921) is published. She calls for coercive sterilization, mandatory segregation, and rehabilitative concentration camps for all “dysgenic stocks” including Blacks, Hispanics, American Indians and Catholics.

October 28, 1939: In an address by John Foster Dulles, later U.S. Secretary of State, he proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.

1939: New World Order by H. G. Wells proposes a collectivist one-world state”‘ or “new world order” comprised of “socialist democracies.” He advocates “universal conscription for service” and declares that “nationalist individualism… is the world’s disease.” He continues:

“The manifest necessity for some collective world control to eliminate warfare and the less generally admitted necessity for a collective control of the economic and biological life of mankind, are aspects of one and the same process.” He proposes that this be accomplished through “universal law” and propaganda (or education).”

1940: The New World Order is published by the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and contains a select list of references on regional and world federation, together with some special plans for world order after the war.

December 12, 1940: In The Congressional Record an article entitled A New World Order John G. Alexander calls for a world federation.

1942: The leftist Institute of Pacific Relations publishes Post War Worlds by P.E. Corbett:

“World government is the ultimate aim… It must be recognized that the law of nations takes precedence over national law… The process will have to be assisted by the deletion of the nationalistic material employed in educational textbooks and its replacement by material explaining the benefits of wiser association.”

June 28, 1945: President Truman endorses world government in a speech:

“It will be just as easy for nations to get along in a republic of the world as it is for us to get along in a republic of the United States.”

October 24, 1945: The United Nations Charter becomes effective. Also on October 24, Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho) introduces Senate Resolution 183 calling upon the U.S. Senate to go on record as favoring creation of a world republic including an international police force.

1946: Alger Hiss is elected President of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Hiss holds this office until 1949. Early in 1950, he is convicted of perjury and sentenced to prison after a sensational trial and Congressional hearing in which Whittaker Chambers, a former senior editor of Time, testifies that Hiss was a member of his Communist Party cell.

1946: The Teacher and World Government by former editor of the NEA Journal (National Education Association) Joy Elmer Morgan is published. He says:

“In the struggle to establish an adequate world government, the teacher… can do much to prepare the hearts and minds of children for global understanding and cooperation… At the very heart of all the agencies which will assure the coming of world government must stand the school, the teacher, and the organized profession.”

1947: The American Education Fellowship, formerly the Progressive Education Association, organized by John Dewey, calls for the:

“… establishment of a genuine world order, an order in which national sovereignty is subordinate to world authority… “

October, 1947: NEA Associate Secretary William Carr writes in the NEA Journal that teachers should:

“… teach about the various proposals that have been made for the strengthening of the United Nations and the establishment of a world citizenship and world government.”

1948: Walden II by behavioral psychologist B.F. Skinner proposes “a perfect society or new and more perfect order” in which children are reared by the State, rather than by their parents and are trained from birth to demonstrate only desirable behavior and characteristics. Skinner’s ideas would be widely implemented by educators in the 1960s, 70s, and 80s as Values Clarification and Outcome Based Education.

July, 1948: Britain’s Sir Harold Butler, in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs, sees “a New World Order” taking shape:

“How far can the life of nations, which for centuries have thought of themselves as distinct and unique, be merged with the life of other nations? How far are they prepared to sacrifice a part of their sovereignty without which there can be no effective economic or political union?… Out of the prevailing confusion a new world is taking shape… which may point the way toward the new order… That will be the beginning of a real United Nations, no longer crippled by a split personality, but held together by a common faith.”

1948: UNESCO president and Fabian Socialist, Sir Julian Huxley, calls for a radical eugenic policy in UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy. He states:

“Thus, even though it is quite true that any radical eugenic policy of controlled human breeding will be for many years politically and psychologically impossible, it will be important for UNESCO to see that the eugenic problem is examined with the greatest care and that the public mind is informed of the issues at stake that much that is now unthinkable may at least become thinkable.”

1948: The preliminary draft of a World Constitution is published by U.S. educators advocating regional federation on the way toward world federation or government with England incorporated into a European federation.

The Constitution provides for a “World Council” along with a “Chamber of Guardians” to enforce world law. Also included is a “Preamble” calling upon nations to surrender their arms to the world government, and includes the right of this “Federal Republic of the World” to seize private property for federal use.

February 9, 1950: The Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee introduces Senate Concurrent Resolution 66 which begins:

“Whereas, in order to achieve universal peace and justice, the present Charter of the United Nations should be changed to provide a true world government constitution.”

The resolution was first introduced in the Senate on September 13, 1949 by Senator Glen Taylor (D-Idaho). Senator Alexander Wiley (R-Wisconsin) called it “a consummation devoutly to be wished for” and said, “I understand your proposition is either change the United Nations, or change or create, by a separate convention, a world order.” Senator Taylor later stated:

“We would have to sacrifice considerable sovereignty to the world organization to enable them to levy taxes in their own right to support themselves.”

1950: In testimony before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, international financier James P Warburg said:

“we shall have a world government, whether or not we like it. The question is only whether world government will be achieved by consent or by conquest.”

April 12, 1952: John Foster Dulles, later to become Secretary of State, says in a speech to the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky, that “treaty laws can override the Constitution.” He says treaties can take power away from Congress and give them to the President. They can take powers from the States and give them to the Federal Government or to some international body and they can cut across the rights given to the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights. A Senate amendment, proposed by GOP Senator John Bricker, would have provided that no treaty could supersede the Constitution, but it fails to pass by one vote.

1954: Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands establishes the Bilderbergers, international politicians and bankers who meet secretly on an annual basis.

1954: H. Rowan Gaither, Jr., President – Ford Foundation said to Norman Dodd of the Congressional Reese Commission:

“… all of us here at the policy-making level have had experience with directives… from the White House…. The substance of them is that we shall use our grant-making power so as to alter our life in the United States that we can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.”

1954: Senator William Jenner said:

“Today the path to total dictatorship in the United States can be laid by strictly legal means, unseen and unheard by the Congress, the President, or the people… outwardly we have a Constitutional government. We have operating within our government and political system, another body representing another form of government, a bureaucratic elite which believes our Constitution is outmoded and is sure that it is the winning side…. All the strange developments in the foreign policy agreements may be traced to this group who are going to make us over to suit their pleasure…. This political action group has its own local political support organizations, its own pressure groups, its own vested interests, its foothold within our government, and its own propaganda apparatus.”

1958: World Peace through World Law is published, where authors Grenville Clark and Louis Sohn advocate using the U.N. as a governing body for the world, world disarmament, a world police force and legislature.

1959: The Council on Foreign Relations calls for a New International Order. Study Number 7, issued on November 25, advocated:

“… new international order [which] must be responsive to world aspirations for peace, for social and economic change… an international order… including states labeling themselves as ’socialist’ [communist].”

1959: The World Constitution and Parliament Association is founded which later develops a Diagram of World Government under the Constitution for the Federation of Earth.

1959: The Mid-Century Challenge to U.S. Foreign Policy is published, sponsored by the Rockefeller Brothers’ Fund. It explains that the U.S.:

“… cannot escape, and indeed should welcome… the task which history has imposed on us. This is the task of helping to shape a new world order in all its dimensions: spiritual, economic, political, social.”

September 9, 1960: President Eisenhower signs Senate Joint Resolution 170, promoting the concept of a federal Atlantic Union. Pollster and Atlantic Union Committee treasurer, Elmo Roper, later delivers an address titled, The Goal Is Government of All the World, in which he states:

“For it becomes clear that the first step toward World Government cannot be completed until we have advanced on the four fronts: the economic, the military, the political and the social.”

1961: The U.S. State Department issues a plan to disarm all nations and arm the United Nations. State Department Document Number 7277 is entitled Freedom From War: The U.S. Program for General and Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World. It details a three-stage plan to disarm all nations and arm the U.N. with the final stage in which “no state would have the military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace Force.”

March 1, 1962: Sen. Clark speaking on the floor of the Senate about PL 87-297 which calls for the disbanding of all armed forces and the prohibition of their re-establishment in any form whatsoever. “… This program is the fixed, determined and approved policy of the government of the United States.”

1962: New Calls for World Federalism. In a study titled, A World Effectively Controlled by the United Nations, CFR member Lincoln Bloomfield states:

“… if the communist dynamic was greatly abated, the West might lose whatever incentive it has for world government.”

The Future of Federalism by author Nelson Rockefeller is published. The one-time Governor of New York, claims that current events compellingly demand a “new world order,” as the old order is crumbling, and there is “a new and free order struggling to be born.” Rockefeller says there is:

“a fever of nationalism… [but] the nation-state is becoming less and less competent to perform its international political tasks…. These are some of the reasons pressing us to lead vigorously toward the true building of a new world order… [with] voluntary service… and our dedicated faith in the brotherhood of all mankind…. Sooner perhaps than we may realize… there will evolve the bases for a federal structure of the free world.”

1963: J. William Fulbright, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee speaks at a symposium sponsored by the Fund for the Republic, a left-wing project of the Ford Foundation:

“The case for government by elites is irrefutable… government by the people is possible but highly improbable.”

1964: Taxonomy of Educational Objectives, Handbook II is published. Author Benjamin Bloom states:

“… a large part of what we call ‘good teaching’ is the teacher’s ability to attain affective objectives through challenging the students’ fixed beliefs.”

His Outcome-Based Education (OBE) method of teaching would first be tried as Mastery Learning in Chicago schools. After five years, Chicago students’ test scores had plummeted causing outrage among parents. OBE would leave a trail of wreckage wherever it would be tried and under whatever name it would be used. At the same time, it would become crucial to globalists for overhauling the education system to promote attitude changes among school students.

1964: Visions of Order by Richard Weaver is published. He describes:

“progressive educators as a ‘revolutionary cabal’ engaged in ‘a systematic attempt to undermine society’s traditions and beliefs.’”

1967: Richard Nixon calls for New World Order. In Asia after Vietnam, in the October issue of Foreign Affairs, Nixon writes of nations’ dispositions to evolve regional approaches to development needs and to the evolution of a “new world order.”

1968: Joy Elmer Morgan, former editor of the NEA Journal publishes The American Citizens Handbook in which he says:

“the coming of the United Nations and the urgent necessity that it evolve into a more comprehensive form of world government places upon the citizens of the United States an increased obligation to make the most of their citizenship which now widens into active world citizenship.”

July 26, 1968: Nelson Rockefeller pledges support of the New World Order. In an Associated Press report, Rockefeller pledges that, “as President, he would work toward international creation of a new world order.”

1970: Education and the mass media promote world order. In Thinking About A New World Order for the Decade 1990, author Ian Baldwin, Jr. asserts that:

“… the World Law Fund has begun a worldwide research and educational program that will introduce a new, emerging discipline: world order: into educational curricula throughout the world… and to concentrate some of its energies on bringing basic world order concepts into the mass media again on a worldwide level.”

1972: President Nixon visits China. In his toast to Chinese Premier Chou En-lai, former CFR member and now President, Richard Nixon, expresses “the hope that each of us has to build a new world order.”

May 18, 1972: In speaking of the coming of world government, Roy M. Ash, director of the Office of Management and Budget, declares that:

“within two decades the institutional framework for a world economic community will be in place… [and] aspects of individual sovereignty will be given over to a supernational authority.”

1973: The Trilateral Commission is established. Banker David Rockefeller organizes this new private body and chooses Zbigniew Brzezinski, later National Security Advisor to President Carter, as the Commission’s first director and invites Jimmy Carter to become a founding member.

1973: Humanist Manifesto II is published:

“The next century can be and should be the humanistic century… we stand at the dawn of a new age… a secular society on a planetary scale…. As non-theists we begin with humans not God, nature not deity… we deplore the division of humankind on nationalistic grounds…. Thus we look to the development of a system of world law and a world order based upon transnational federal government…. The true revolution is occurring.”

April, 1974: Former U. S. Deputy Assistant Secretary of State, Trilateralist and CFR member Richard Gardner’s article The Hard Road to World Order is published in the CFR’s Foreign Affairs where he states that:

“the ‘house of world order’ will have to be built from the bottom up rather than from the top down… but an end run around national sovereignty, eroding it piece by piece, will accomplish much more than the old-fashioned frontal assault.”

1974: The World Conference of Religion for Peace, held in Louvain, Belgium is held. Douglas Roche presents a report entitled We Can Achieve a New World Order.

The U.N. calls for wealth redistribution: In a report entitled New International Economic Order, the U.N. General Assembly outlines a plan to redistribute the wealth from the rich to the poor nations.

1975: A study titled, A New World Order, is published by the Center of International Studies, Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Studies, Princeton University.

1975: In Congress, 32 Senators and 92 Representatives sign A Declaration of Interdependence, written by historian Henry Steele Commager. The Declaration states that:

“we must join with others to bring forth a new world order… Narrow notions of national sovereignty must not be permitted to curtail that obligation.”

Congresswoman Marjorie Holt refuses to sign the Declaration saying:

“It calls for the surrender of our national sovereignty to international organizations. It declares that our economy should be regulated by international authorities. It proposes that we enter a ‘new world order’ that would redistribute the wealth created by the American people.”

1975: Retired Navy Admiral Chester Ward, former Judge Advocate General of the U.S. Navy and former CFR member, writes in a critique that the goal of the CFR is the “submergence of U. S. sovereignty and national independence into an all powerful one-world government… “

1975: Kissinger on the Couch is published. Authors Phyllis Schlafly and former CFR member Chester Ward state:

“Once the ruling members of the CFR have decided that the U.S. government should espouse a particular policy, the very substantial research facilities of the CFR are put to work to develop arguments, intellectual and emotional, to support the new policy and to confound, discredit, intellectually and politically, any opposition… “

1976: RIO: Reshaping the International Order is published by the globalist Club of Rome, calling for a new international order, including an economic redistribution of wealth.

1977: The Third Try at World Order is published. Author Harlan Cleveland of the Aspen Institute for Humanistic Studies calls for:

“changing Americans’ attitudes and institutions” for “complete disarmament (except for international soldiers)” and “for individual entitlement to food, health and education.”

1977: Imperial Brain Trust by Laurence Shoup and William Minter is published. The book takes a critical look at the Council on Foreign Relations with chapters such as: Shaping a New World Order: The Council’s Blueprint for Global Hegemony, 1939-1944 and Toward the 1980’s: The Council’s Plans for a New World Order.

1977: The Trilateral Connection appears in the July edition of Atlantic Monthly. Written by Jeremiah Novak, it says:

“For the third time in this century, a group of American schools, businessmen, and government officials is planning to fashion a New World Order… “

1977: Leading educator Mortimer Adler publishes Philosopher at Large in which he says:

“… if local civil government is necessary for local civil peace, then world civil government is necessary for world peace.”

1979: Barry Goldwater, retiring Republican Senator from Arizona, publishes his autobiography With No Apologies. He writes:

“In my view The Trilateral Commission represents a skillful, coordinated effort to seize control and consolidate the four centers of power: political, monetary, intellectual, and ecclesiastical. All this is to be done in the interest of creating a more peaceful, more productive world community. What the Trilateralists truly intend is the creation of a worldwide economic power superior to the political governments of the nation-states involved. They believe the abundant materialism they propose to create will overwhelm existing differences. As managers and creators of the system they will rule the future.”

1984: The Power to Lead is published. Author James McGregor Burns admits:

“The framers of the U.S. constitution have simply been too shrewd for us. The have outwitted us. They designed separate institutions that cannot be unified by mechanical linkages, frail bridges, tinkering. If we are to ‘turn the Founders upside down’: we must directly confront the constitutional structure they erected.”

1985: Norman Cousins, the honorary chairman of Planetary Citizens for the World We Chose, is quoted in Human Events:

“World government is coming, in fact, it is inevitable. No arguments for or against it can change that fact.”

Cousins was also president of the World Federalist Association, an affiliate of the World Association for World Federation (WAWF), headquartered in Amsterdam. WAWF is a leading force for world federal government and is accredited by the U.N. as a Non-Governmental Organization.

1987: The Secret Constitution and the Need for Constitutional Change is sponsored in part by the Rockefeller Foundation. Some thoughts of author Arthur S. Miller are:

“… a pervasive system of thought control exists in the United States… the citizenry is indoctrinated by employment of the mass media and the system of public education… people are told what to think about… the old order is crumbling… Nationalism should be seen as a dangerous social disease… A new vision is required to plan and manage the future, a global vision that will transcend national boundaries and eliminate the poison of nationalistic solutions… a new Constitution is necessary.”

1988: Former Under-secretary of State and CFR member George Ball in a January 24 interview in the New York Times says:

“The Cold War should no longer be the kind of obsessive concern that it is. Neither side is going to attack the other deliberately… If we could internationalize by using the U.N. in conjunction with the Soviet Union, because we now no longer have to fear, in most cases, a Soviet veto, then we could begin to transform the shape of the world and might get the U.N. back to doing something useful… Sooner or later we are  going to have to face restructuring our institutions so that they are not confined merely to the nation-states. Start first on a regional and ultimately you could move to a world basis.”

December 7, 1988: In an address to the U.N., Mikhail Gorbachev calls for mutual consensus:

“World progress is only possible through a search for universal human consensus as we move forward to a new world order.”

May 12, 1989: President Bush invites the Soviets to join World Order. Speaking to the graduating class at Texas A&M University, Mr. Bush states that the United States is ready to welcome the Soviet Union “back into the world order.”

1989: Carl Bernstein’s (Woodward and Bernstein of Watergate fame) book Loyalties: A Son’s Memoir is published. His father and mother had been members of the Communist party. Bernstein’s father tells his son about the book:

“You’re going to prove [Sen. Joseph] McCarthy was right, because all he was saying is that the system was loaded with Communists. And he was right… I’m worried about the kind of book you’re going to write and about cleaning up McCarthy. The problem is that everybody said he was a liar; you’re saying he was right… I agree that the Party was a force in the country.”

1990: The World Federalist Association faults the American press. Writing in their Summer/Fall newsletter, Deputy Director Eric Cox describes world events over the past year or two and declares:

“It’s sad but true that the slow-witted American press has not grasped the significance of most of these developments. But most federalists know what is happening… And they are not frightened by the old bug-a-boo of sovereignty.”

September 11, 1990: President Bush calls the Gulf War an opportunity for the New World Order. In an address to Congress entitled Toward a New World Order, Mr. Bush says:

“The crisis in the Persian Gulf offers a rare opportunity to move toward an historic period of cooperation. Out of these troubled times… a new world order can emerge in which the nations of the world, east and west, north and south, can prosper and live in harmony…. Today the new world is struggling to be born.”

September 25, 1990: In an address to the U.N., Soviet Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze describes Iraq’s invasion of Kuwait as “an act of terrorism [that] has been perpetrated against the emerging New World Order.” On December 31, Gorbachev declares that the New World Order would be ushered in by the Gulf Crisis.

October 1, 1990: In a U.N. address, President Bush speaks of the:

“… collective strength of the world community expressed by the U.N. … an historic movement towards a new world order… a new partnership of nations… a time when humankind came into its own… to bring about a revolution of the spirit and the mind and begin a journey into a… new age.”

1991: Author Linda MacRae-Campbell publishes How to Start a Revolution at Your School in the publication In Context. She promotes the use of “change agents” as “self-acknowledged revolutionaries” and “co-conspirators.”

1991: President Bush praises the New World Order in a State of Union Message:

“What is at stake is more than one small country, it is a big idea: a new world order… to achieve the universal aspirations of mankind… based on shared principles and the rule of law…. The illumination of a thousand points of light…. The winds of change are with us now.”

February 6, 1991: President Bush tells the Economic Club of New York:

“My vision of a new world order foresees a United Nations with a revitalized peacekeeping function.”

June, 1991: The Council on Foreign Relations co-sponsors an assembly Rethinking America’s Security: Beyond Cold War to New World Order which is attended by 65 prestigious members of government, labor, academia, the media, military, and the professions from nine countries. Later, several of the conference participants joined some 100 other world leaders for another closed door meeting of the Bilderberg Society in Baden Baden, Germany. The Bilderbergers also exert considerable clout in determining the foreign policies of their respective governments. While at that meeting, David Rockefeller said in a speech:

“We are grateful to the Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subjected to the lights of publicity during those years. But, the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries.”

July, 1991: The Southeastern World Affairs Institute discusses the New World Order. In a program, topics include, Legal Structures for a New World Order and The United Nations: From its Conception to a New World Order. Participants include a former director of the U.N.’s General Legal Division, and a former Secretary General of International Planned Parenthood.

Late July, 1991: On a Cable News Network program, CFR member and former CIA director Stansfield Turner (Rhodes scholar), when asked about Iraq, responded:

“We have a much bigger objective. We’ve got to look at the long run here. This is an example: the situation between the United Nations and Iraq: where the United Nations is deliberately intruding into the sovereignty of a sovereign nation… Now this is a marvelous precedent (to be used in) all countries of the world… “

October 29, 1991: David Funderburk, former U. S. Ambassador to Romania, tells a North Carolina audience:

“George Bush has been surrounding himself with people who believe in one-world government. They believe that the Soviet system and the American system are converging.” The vehicle to bring this about, said Funderburk, is the United Nations, “the majority of whose 166 member states are socialist, atheist, and anti-American.”

Funderburk served as ambassador in Bucharest from 1981 to 1985, when he resigned in frustration over U.S. support of the oppressive regime of the late Rumanian dictator, Nicolae Ceausescu.

October 30, 1991:: President Gorbachev at the Middle East Peace Talks in Madrid states:

“We are beginning to see practical support. And this is a very significant sign of the movement towards a new era, a new age… We see both in our country and elsewhere… ghosts of the old thinking… When we rid ourselves of their presence, we will be better able to move toward a new world order… relying on the relevant mechanisms of the United Nations.”

Elsewhere, in Alexandria, Virginia, Elena Lenskaya, Counsellor to the Minister of Education of Russia, delivers the keynote address for a program titled, Education for a New World Order.

1992: The Twilight of Sovereignty by CFR member (and former Citicorp Chairman) Walter Wriston is published, in which he claims:

“A truly global economy will require … compromises of national sovereignty… There is no escaping the system.”

1992: The United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED) Earth Summit takes place in Rio de Janeiro this year, headed by Conference Secretary-General Maurice Strong. The main products of this summit are the Biodiversity Treaty and Agenda 21, which the U.S. hesitates to sign because of opposition at home due to the threat to sovereignty and economics. The summit says the first world’s wealth must be transferred to the third world.

July 20, 1992: Time magazine publishes The Birth of the Global Nation by Strobe Talbott, Rhodes Scholar, roommate of Bill Clinton at Oxford University, CFR Director, and Trilateralist, in which he writes:

“All countries are basically social arrangements… No matter how permanent or even sacred they may seem at any one time, in fact they are all artificial and temporary… Perhaps national sovereignty wasn’t such a great idea after all… But it has taken the events in our own wondrous and terrible century to clinch the case for world government.”

As an editor of Time, Talbott defended Clinton during his presidential campaign. He was appointed by President Clinton as the number two person at the State Department behind Secretary of State Warren Christopher, former Trilateralist and former CFR Vice-Chairman and Director. Talbott was confirmed by about two-thirds of the U.S. Senate despite his statement about the unimportance of national sovereignty.

September 29, 1992: At a town hall meeting in Los Angeles, Trilateralist and former CFR president Winston Lord delivers a speech titled Changing Our Ways: America and the New World, in which he remarks:

“To a certain extent, we are going to have to yield some of our sovereignty, which will be controversial at home… [Under] the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA)… some Americans are going to be hurt as low-wage jobs are taken away.”

Lord became an Assistant Secretary of State in the Clinton administration.

1992: President Bush addressing the General Assembly of the U.N said:

“It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance.”

Winter, 1992-93: The CFR’s Foreign Affairs publishes Empowering the United Nations by U.N. Secretary General Boutros-Boutros Ghali, who asserts:

“It is undeniable that the centuries-old doctrine of absolute and exclusive sovereignty no longer stands… Underlying the rights of the individual and the rights of peoples is a dimension of universal sovereignty that resides in all humanity… It is a sense that increasingly finds expression in the gradual expansion of international law… In this setting the significance of the United Nations should be evident and accepted.”

1993: Strobe Talbott receives the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award for his 1992 Time article, The Birth of the Global Nation and in appreciation for what he has done “for the cause of global governance.” President Clinton writes a letter of congratulation which states:

“Norman Cousins worked for world peace and world government…. Strobe Talbott’s lifetime achievements as a voice for global harmony have earned him this recognition… He will be a worthy recipient of the Norman Cousins Global Governance Award. Best wishes… for future success.”

Not only does President Clinton use the specific term, “world government,” but he also expressly wishes the WFA “future success” in pursuing world federal government. Talbott proudly accepts the award, but says the WFA should have given it to the other nominee, Mikhail Gorbachev.

July 18, 1993: CFR member and Trilateralist Henry Kissinger writes in the Los Angeles Times concerning NAFTA:

“What Congress will have before it is not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system… a first step toward a new world order.”

August 23, 1993: Christopher Hitchens, Socialist friend of Bill Clinton when he was at Oxford University, says in a C-SPAN interview:

“… it is, of course the case that there is a ruling class in this country, and that it has allies internationally.”

October 30, 1993: Washington Post ombudsman Richard Harwood does an op-ed piece about the role of the CFR’s media members:

“Their membership is an acknowledgment of their ascension into the American ruling class [where] they do not merely analyze and interpret foreign policy for the United States; they help make it.”

January/February, 1994: The CFR’s Foreign Affairs prints an opening article by CFR Senior Fellow Michael Clough in which he writes that the “Wise Men” (e.g. Paul Nitze, Dean Acheson, George Kennan, and John J. McCloy) have:

“assiduously guarded it [American foreign policy] for the past 50 years… They ascended to power during World War II… This was as it should be. National security and the national interest, they argued must transcend the special interests and passions of the people who make up America… How was this small band of Atlantic-minded internationalists able to triumph … Eastern internationalists were able to shape and staff the burgeoning foreign policy institutions… As long as the Cold War endured and nuclear Armageddon seemed only a missile away, the public was willing to tolerate such an undemocratic foreign policy making system.”

1994: In the Human Development Report, published by the UN Development Program, there was a section called “Global Governance For the 21st Century”. The administrator for this program was appointed by Bill Clinton. His name is James Gustave Speth. The opening sentence of the report said:

“Mankind’s problems can no longer be solved by national government. What is needed is a World Government. This can best be achieved by strengthening the United Nations system.”

1995: The State of the World Forum took place in the fall of this year, sponsored by the Gorbachev Foundation located at the Presidio in San Francisco. Foundation President Jim Garrison chairs the meeting of who’s-whos from around the world including Margaret Thatcher, Maurice Strong, George Bush, Mikhail Gorbachev and others. Conversation centers around the oneness of mankind and the coming global government. However, the term “global governance” is now used in place of “new world order” since the latter has become a political liability, being a lightning rod for opponents of global government.

1996: The United Nations 420-page report Our Global Neighborhood is published. It outlines a plan for “global governance,” calling for an international Conference on Global Governance in 1998 for the purpose of submitting to the world the necessary treaties and agreements for ratification by the year 2000.

John Dewey, 1898:

“Change must come gradually. To force it unduly would compromise its final success by favoring a violent reaction.”

Fabian Tract No. 1:

“For the right moment you must wait, as Fabius did most patiently when warring against Hannibal, though many censured his delays; but when the time comes, you must strike hard, as Fabius did, or your waiting will be in vain and fruitless.”

The Fabian Society credo, 1887:

“The Fabian Society consists of Socialists….aims at the reorganization of society by the emancipation of land and Industrial Capital from individual and class ownership, and the vesting of them in the community for the general benefit….The Society accordingly works for the extinction of private property in land. The Society further works for the transfer to the Community of such Industrial Capital as can conveniently be handled socially. For the attainment of these ends the Fabian Society looks to the spread of Socialist opinions, and the social and political consequent thereon.”