February 6, 2008...3:09 am

McCain’s Military Support

Jump to Comments

ARLINGTON, VA — On December 15, over 100 retired admirals and generals endorsed John McCain for President of the United States at a press conference in Columbia, South Carolina. These distinguished leaders supporting John McCain come from all branches of the armed services and include former POWs, Medal of Honor recipients and former members of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.

John McCain was joined today in Columbia by five distinguished military veterans: Admiral Leighton “Snuffy” Smith, USN (Ret.); Vice Admiral Mike Bowman, USN (Ret.); Rear Admiral Tom Lynch, USN (Ret.); Rear Admiral Bob Shumaker, USN (Ret.); and Major General Stan Spears, USA, Adjutant General of South Carolina.

“This nation is at war and we’d better damn well understand that fact,” said Admiral Leighton “Snuffy” Smith, USN (Ret.). “John McCain understands it, and he is the only candidate that has not wavered one bit in his position regarding the importance of victory in the war against Islamic extremism or in his commitment to the troops who are doing the fighting. He has consistently demonstrated the kind and style of leadership that we believe is essential in our next Commander in Chief. Our nation faces a growing array of serious foreign policy challenges. John McCain is the ONE candidate who, in our view, truly understands the strategic landscape and is fully prepared to deal decisively and effectively with those who wish to be our friends and, importantly, those who wish us harm.”

John McCain thanked the admirals and generals, stating, “I am deeply honored to have the support of so many distinguished military leaders. I thank them for the trust they have in me, but more importantly, our nation is indebted to their service in defense of our freedom. Our next president will face two wars and an array of national security challenges around the world. My experience, knowledge and background have prepared me to confront these great challenges and lead as commander in chief from day one.”

* * * * *

A conservative’s case for McCain

IT IS NOT news that much of the conservative base bitterly opposes John McCain and is appalled that the man they consider a Republican apostate could soon be the GOP’s presidential nominee. From talk radio to the blogosphere to the conservative press, many on the right are outraged that what Mitt Romney last week called “the House that Reagan Built” - the modern Republican Party - might anoint as its standard-bearer the candidate who by their lights is the least likely to follow in the Gipper’s footsteps.

Conservatives bristle at the thought of a Republican president who might raise income and payroll taxes. Or enlarge the federal government instead of shrinking it. Or appoint Supreme Court justices who are anything but strict constructionists. Or grant a blanket amnesty to millions of illegal aliens.

Now, I don’t believe that a President McCain would do any of those things. But President Reagan did all of them. Reagan also provided arms to the Khomeini theocracy in Iran, presided over skyrocketing budget deficits, and ordered US troops to cut and run in the face of Islamist terror in the Middle East. McCain would be unlikely to commit any of those sins, either.

Does this mean that Reagan was not, in fact, a great conservative? Of course not. Nor does it mean that McCain has not given his critics on the right legitimate reasons to be disconcerted. My point is simply that the immaculate conservative leader for whom so many on the right yearn to vote is a fantasy. Conservatives who say that McCain is no Ronald Reagan are right, but Mitt Romney is no Ronald Reagan either. Neither is Mike Huckabee. And neither was the real - as opposed to the mythic - Ronald Reagan.

The conservative case against McCain is clear enough; I made it myself in some of these columns when he first ran for president eight years ago. The issues that have earned McCain the label of “maverick” - campaign-finance restrictions, global warming, the Bush tax cuts, immigration, judicial filibusters - are precisely what stick in the craw of the GOP conservative base.

But this year, the conservative case for McCain is vastly more compelling.

On the surpassing national-security issues of the day - confronting the threat from radical Islam and winning the war in Iraq - no one is more stalwart. Even McCain’s fiercest critics, such as conservative radio host Hugh Hewitt, will say so. “The world’s bad guys,” Hewitt writes, “would never for a moment think he would blink in any showdown, or hesitate to strike back at any enemy with the audacity to try again to cripple the US through terror.”

McCain was never an agenda-driven movement conservative, but he “entered public life as a foot soldier in the Reagan Revolution,” as he puts it, and on the whole his record has been that of a robust and committed conservative. He is a spending hawk and an enemy of pork and earmarks. He has never voted to increase taxes, and wants the Bush tax cuts made permanent for the best of reasons: “They worked.” He is a staunch free-trader and a champion of school choice. He is unabashedly prolife and pro-Second Amendment. He opposes same-sex marriage. He wants entitlements reined in and personal retirement accounts expanded.

McCain’s conservatism has usually been more a matter of gut instinct than of a rigorous intellectual worldview, and he has certainly deviated from Republican orthodoxy on some serious issues. For all that, his ratings from conservative watchdog groups have always been high. “Even with all the blemishes,” notes National Review, a leading journal on the right (and a backer of Romney), “McCain has a more consistent conservative record than Giuliani or Romney. . . . This is an abiding strength of his candidacy.”

As a lifelong conservative, I wish McCain evinced a greater understanding that limited government is indispensable to individual liberty. Yet there is no candidate in either party who so thoroughly embodies the conservatism of American honor and tradition as McCain, nor any with greater moral authority to invoke it. For all his transgressions and backsliding, McCain radiates integrity and steadfastness, and if his heterodox stands have at times been infuriating, they also attest to his resolve. Time and again he has taken an unpopular stand and stuck with it, putting his career on the line when it would have been easier to go along with the crowd.

A perfect conservative he isn’t. But he is courageous and steady, a man of character and high standards, a genuine hero. If “the House that Reagan Built” is to be true to its best and highest ideals, it will unite behind John McCain.

Jeff Jacoby’s e-mail address is jacoby@globe.com

2 Comments

  • lostloveletters
    February 6, 2008 at 3:24 am

    Yikes, I have to strongly disagree on a number of points here:

    1) 100 top level military men supported McCain? Of course they are the top men, not the men who are on the front lines in any way shape or form. The highest amount of military donations have gone to Ron Paul for all fundraising quarters… think there is a message here as to what the men/women on the front lines want to do? It’s easy to talk/promote war when your ass isn’t the fodder…

    2) “Yet there is no candidate in either party who so thoroughly embodies the conservatism of American honor and tradition as McCain, nor any with greater moral authority to invoke it”.
    Ouch, my friend, you need to seriously do some more research beyond CNN, FOX news, and MSNBC. Check out ALL the candidates voting records which is a non-biased source and Ron Paul is the only true conservative who has 20 years of voting history to back up his conservative views, McCain can not come anywhere NEAR talking the talk then walking the walk.

    Now I am sure that you will claim that Ron Paul is a kook, a crazy, a racist, these are all the labels that the mainstream has invoked, but for those who dig deeper, educate themselves a little more on history and basic economics beyond the CNN’s of the world (I suggest reading “Economics in one Lesson” by Henry Hazlitt - a 200 page educational publication that breaks it down into pretty clear terms), your eyes will be snapped wide open as to how UNcrazy Dr. Paul is. But are you really ready to take that challenge? Discovering the truth after being indoctrinated your whole life can be quite depressing actually, so be prepared.

    I write this as a 30 year old, young professional woman who is starting to realize how screwed our generation is and who fears for myself being drafted for a war that began under lies and false pretenses. Will you be contributing to the demise of my generation???

  • lostloveletters,

    According to ABC, Barack Obama received the most financial support from people who claimed to be in or work for the U.S. military (4-5,000,000 secretaries, marines, soldiers, sailors, national guard, coast guard, cooks, cleaners, computer programmers, etc.).

    Obama got $27,000.

    Ron Paul got $19,300.

    “Obama got 44 contributions worth about $27,000 and Paul 23 for about $19,300.”

    http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/story?id=3601542

    So I guess you are now an Obama supporter.

    Thank you for your stupid comments and thank you ABC.

    Re: “I am sure that you will claim that Ron Paul is a kook, a crazy, a racist, these are all the labels that the mainstream has invoked”

    I suggest you consult: http://brianakira.wordpress.com/2008/01/11/ron-paul-lunatic/

    There you can obtain pdf copies of the idiot Ron Paul’s ridiculous “newsletters.”

    Your comments are extremely ill-considered and offensive.

    “Top level military men supported McCain? Of course they are the top men, not the men who are on the front lines in any way shape or form. … It’s easy to talk/promote war when your ass isn’t the fodder.”

    So you are saying that admirals and generals are cowards with no combat experience?

    You are saying that they want their troops dead?

    Next you will be saying that John McCain was never on the front line.

    You disgust me.

Leave a Reply