November 7, 2009

Real Matrix Common Purpose Consensus Creation Cognitive Dissonance Leading Ultra Vires

Trust Your Leaders ~ Everything Will Be OK ~ Hope & Change

Village of the Damned

The Masonic front group “Common Purpose” is a registered charity that charges thousands of pounds for communitarian matrix training courses in neurolinguistics, Delphi, Consensus Creation, Cognitive Dissonance, and other forms of psychological control. It’s main initiation course is called Matrix. Its mantras and rites are based on Rockefeller-Tavistock [inventor of "Israel"] methodologies based on the work of John Rawlings Rees and the World Federation for Mental Health [see pdf].

It has offices and agents in every municipality and region of the UK, as well 10,000 agents in the Republic of Ireland (who campaigned to convince the Irish to vote for slavery). Course participants are mostly from the media, the legal profession, the police, security services, the military, banking and finance, the media, the education industry, and government. Their fees are written off for tax purposes. There are at least 100,000 Common Purpose graduates in the UK. Prominent graduates run all three branches of Britain’s triune ruling party.

[See the videos in the "Comments" section below.]

If you wish to complain about this infiltration of this “charity” into government structures, you my complain to the Independent Commission on Good Governance in Public Service, which was created by The Office for Public Management [OPM] and The Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accounting [CIPFA], “in partnership with the Joseph Rowntree Foundation.”

All of these organizations are led and staffed by Common Purpose “graduates”. The mission statements of all three organizations are riddled with talk of the need for “members and officers working together to achieve a common purpose” — “a common purpose to unite the members,” who must “have a common purpose and work well together,” “providing democratic leadership and common purpose” — “a common purpose and shared commitment” — to “establish a common purpose between partners and work through challenges in a co-operative rather than a competitive way” – ”putting all resources together in a single pot either to serve a common purpose or to even out inconsistencies,” in order to “generate civic pride and bring our communities together with a common purpose.” In fact, “fundamental issues of control and common purpose need to be resolved early.” Their “common purpose is to achieve, through synergy, more than two single parties might achieve alone. This is the guiding principle.” Indeed, they will surely react to your complaints with a common purpose. In this sense, resistance is futile.

The Joseph Roundtree Trust

The JRF is “an independent social policy researcher committed to funding radical change towards a better world, mainly in the UK, Ireland and South Africa.” One of its main areas of research is genetics. The JRF is “creating” not just a better world, but also a better human being, without the flaws that “God” cursed Man with. Its motto is “Search, Demonstrate, Influence.” “The Joseph Rowntree Foundation has started a UK-wide debate to find out what are The Social Evils of the 21st Century.” — “Sign up for our social evils email alerts if you want to be kept up-to-date about our Social Evils project.

And what are The Social Evils of the 21st Century? Matthew Taylor, in “Reflections on social evils and human nature,” a chapter of the JRT’s 2009 book, Contemporary Social Evils, concludes,

President Obama called for solutions that require leadership, overcoming group victimhood and promoting personal responsibility. Aren’t the best schools the ones with visionary and strong leaders, that want their pupils to thrive as individuals and which create a strong sense of community and pride in the institution? No solution is perfect, and cultural theory insists that each paradigm of social relations gains its strength from competing for power and adherents with the others (selfish memes to go with our selfish genes).

The human race has made great strides, especially in the last few hundred years. But progress has been interspersed with error and tragedy. By privileging one way of thinking over others – as we have recently done with individualism – we at best squander human potential and at worst risk disaster. We could achieve more and be happier about it if our ways of thinking and acting engaged with all the ways in which we are human.

Some may find this inspiring. Personally I believe that St Paul said it all 2000 years ago:

“Our struggle is not against flesh and blood but against the principalities, powers, against the world-rulers of this darkness and against the evil spiritual forces of the supernatural realms.” [Ephesians 6:12]

Fortunately,

“Neither death, nor life, nor angels, nor principalities, nor things present, nor things to come, nor powers, nor height, nor depth, nor any other created thing, will be able to separate us from the love of God which is in Christ Jesus our Lord.” [Romans 8:38-39]

According to the Joseph Rowntree Trust’s Created Conssencus regarding the Social Evils of the 21st century, the “Dominant Opinion” was that,

“Some people identified religion itself as a social evil. This group generally focused on one of three issues: the “erosion of secularism”; religion as cause of intolerance and conflict; and religion as a source of irrationality.

Religion and politics: “the erosion of secularism”

Some participants focused on the role of religion in politics arguing that “we should not be making any political or educational decisions based on religion”. One person criticised the fact that there are faith representatives in the House of Lords, but a more common complaint surrounded the influence of religion in education. For example, citing religion as a social evil, one participant went on to say that “children should be taught to derive their conclusions from evidence and logic, not the ravings of deluded idiots”. Another criticised the fact that “religious doctrinaires [are] increasing their grip on the UK education system with government support”. One participant argued that “the state should become disestablished from the Church of England and there should be an end to state funding of faith schools”. Other participants warned that faith schools “foster a lack of tolerance towards other faiths and lifestyles”.

Religion and social cohesion: “the most divisive agent in our society”

Some people saw religion as a social evil because it “undermines social cohesion” and is “a force for separating people”. Participants also felt that religion can actively encourage intolerance, towards some groups in particular: “Faith in supernatural phenomena inspires hatred and prejudice throughout the world, and is commonly used as justification for continued persecution of women, gays and people who do not have faith”. So in stark contrast to those who see the decline of religion as complicit in a decline of values, some participants blamed religion itself for undermining certain values. Another participant highlighted the deficiencies of religion as the basis of a value system for a different reason:

There are too many of them [religions], and none make any sense. We need to develop a consensus around rules for a decent, open and honest society, perhaps based on a refined Human Rights Act.

Religion and knowledge: “ridiculous hypotheses as unquestionable truth”

Other participants identified religions as social evils because they “promote strong beliefs for which there is no objective evidence [and] undermine rational behaviour”. Another person explained that religion “should no longer be a consideration in the 21st century as we get more scientific in our outlook. But it appears to be going through a resurgence in popularity and this brings intolerance and anti-intellectualism.” One participant cited the example of religions “blocking the distribution of condoms in countries with high rates of HIV” as an example of the harm religious doctrine can cause. Several participants felt that the irrationality of religion is so clear that our tolerance of it is unjustified: “The idea that a person can believe a proposition to be true in spite of no supporting evidence, and even in spite of evidence to the contrary, is something that should not be automatically granted respect, but treated with contempt”.

[What are today’s social evils?: The results of a web consultation, by Beth Watts, Joseph Rowntree Foundation, 2009, p. 30-31.]

Besides the evils of Individualism and Faith in God, other Social Evils of the 21st Century identified by the Joseph Rowntree Foundation with tax-payer funding, are, predictably, “Unheard Voices”, inequality, intolerance, the criminalization of drugs, out-dated conceptions of Family, lack of social diversity, hostility towards immigration, Islamophobia, homophobia, climate change [sic], insufficient financial support for immigrant workers, and so on.

CIPFA

CIPFA, “the acknowledged champion of the public sector and recognized expert in the PFM international architecture,” also operates extensively in NATO-occupied former Yugoslavia, in China, India, Armenia, Canada, Australia, Ethiopia, South Africa, Russia, the United States of America, Afghanistan, Thailand, Malaysia, Kenya, Moldova, Albania, Iceland, Ghana, Spain, and so on, and so on, and so on, promoting its “whole systems approach” globally; setting standards for the world; gathering information worldwide.

CIPFA - Simplified diagram of the PFM International Architecture

Membership of the gate-keeping Independent Commission on Good Goovernance in Public Service

Chair of the Commission

  • Sir Alan Langlands, Principal and Vice Chancellor, University of Dundee

Commission members

  • Lord Richard Best, Director, Joseph Rowntree Foundation
  • Sir Ian Blair, Deputy Commissioner, Metropolitan Police Service
  • Mr Jim Coulter, Chief Executive, National Housing Federation
  • Ms Lucy de Groot, Executive Director, Improvement and Development Agency
  • Ms Liz Kerry, Chief Executive, Yorkshire and Humber Assembly
  • Mr Bob Kerslake, Chief Executive, Sheffi eld County Council
  • Mr Ed Mayo, Chief Executive, National Consumer Council
  • Dr Greg Parston, Executive Chairman, OPM
  • Ms Bharti Patel, to October 2004 Director of Communications, Ethnic Minority Foundation
  • The Honourable Barbara Thomas, Deputy Chair, Financial Reporting Council and from September 2004 Chairman, United Kingdom Atomic Energy Authority
  • Ms Jo Williams cbe, Chief Executive, Mencap

Co-secretaries to the Commission

  • Steve Freer, Chief Executive, CIPFA
  • Adrienne Fresko cbe, Head of the Centre for Public Governance, OPM
  • (to 30 September 2004)
  • Jane Steele, Head of Public Interest Research, OPM (from 1 October 2004)

Head of Research for the Commission

  • Jane Steele, Head of Public Interest Research, OPM

Research and support team

  • Kerry Ace, Finance and Policy Manager, CIPFA
  • Andrea Carr, Project Administrator, OPM
  • Robert Coffey, Researcher, OPM (from September 2004)
  • Kerri Hampton, Senior Researcher, OPM (to September 2004)
  • Sandra Harper, Group Administrator, CIPFA

Common Purpose was formed in the 1980s, and has received millions of pounds in public funding, but was mostly unknown to non-participants until 2007, when it was exposed by the aptly-named “Common Purpose Exposed“. Common Purpose is still widely ignored in the media. Any time it is mentioned, critics are mockingly referred to as “akin to flat-earthers, conspiracy nuts, holocaust-deniers, 911-truthers” etc.

British 20 Pound Note

Detail of British ₤20 Note

Common Purpose’s Self-Description

Common Purpose is an independent leadership organisation that aims to improve the way organisations and society work. Common Purpose operates throughout the UK and worldwide in France, Germany, Ghana, Hungary, India, Ireland, South Africa, Sweden, and the Netherlands, and is developing programmes in Israel and Turkey.

Very few people emerge from Common Purpose with their prejudices — or working practices — unchanged. As their perspective gets wider, their vision improves. As their vision improves, their decision-making gets better. They forge networks that can have a major impact on their organisation and the community (networks which no other experience can provide).

Common Purpose applies The Chatham House Rule, developed for the RIIA and its sub-groups such as the CFR, the UN and Bilderberg.

The Chatham House Rule was devised at Chatham House (the home of the Royal Institute for International Affairs in London*) in 1927 and was refined in 1992 and 2002. It is an internationally recognised and respected way of conducting meetings and it reads as follows:

“When a meeting is held under the Chatham House Rule, participants are free to use the information received, but neither the identity nor the affiliation of the speaker(s), nor that of any other participant, may be revealed”

Common Purpose Programmes

Matrix/Focus

Common Purpose Matrix and Focus are unique, locally rooted programmes for experienced leaders. Both are powerful educational experiences that bring together leaders from all sectors. Matrix is prepared for major cities and larger geographical regions, while Focus is geared towards smaller cities and large towns.

TheKNOW

TheKNOW is Common Purpose’s new flexible programme; designed to appeal to leaders whose schedules make it impossible for them to commit to ten fixed programme days a year.

Meridian

Meridian is the new, international name for TheKNOW. Meridian is being successfully run in six countries. To reflect this, the UK is adopting the name Meridian from 2008 onwards.

InsideOUT

Common Purpose InsideOUT brings together leaders from distinct locations in the “powerhouse circle” that surrounds London.

Profile

A fast and effective two-day briefing for leaders in the areas where they operate.

Common Purpose Navigator

Common Purpose Navigator is the leadership programme for emerging, high-potential individuals tipped as people to watch in their organisations.

International Navigator

International Navigator is a powerful learning experience that brings together high-potential, early-career individuals from widely differing backgrounds – on a local, regional, national and international basis.

Real Edge

To help rising stars to avoid this risk, Common Purpose has designed RealEdge. Based on unique leadership techniques crafted over nearly 20 years, RealEdge is an investment in promising individuals and their careers that continues to stretch their horizons, their networks – and their comfort zones – over time.

20:20

20:20 brings together national leaders from across the UK to examine forces that will drive changes to society over the next twenty years, especially in the areas of wealth creation and governance.

Power Dynamic

A challenging and informative one-day event for both Common Purpose graduates and those new to Common Purpose who need to know more about how power works at a national or European level, and how they can influence it.

Frontrunner

Frontrunner targets pre-career leaders who have already shown evidence of leadership skills in civil society and aims to inspire them to continue campaigning for change in their future careers.

What Next?

What Next? is a joint initiative with Oxford Said Business School. It’s a programme for people who are completing one stage of their career, and are now looking for new and possibly very different opportunities.

From Stop Common Purpose

COMMON PURPOSE METHODS

The methods used by Common Purpose are what you would expect from fraudsters in this Jigsaw of Deception.

The use of political correctness for social control and mental manipulation, deceit, fraudulent agenda, corrupt abuse of public funds, obsessive control freakery, secrecy and bland, banal and meaningless statements.

Many of the methods used by Common Purpose originated at the Tavistock Institute.

Trojan Mice

Although Common Purpose is a ‘Trojan Horse’ operation, some of its methods have been more akin to ‘Trojan Mice’. Trojan Mice operations have their roots in complex adaptive systems and Chaos Theory.

These systems theories get a bit complicated but it boils down to the idea that the best way to change an organisation (or a country for that matter) is by the use of small changes which very few people take any notice of at the time. These small changes increment over time to make large changes. When the large changes become apparent to the organisation’s members or the general public, they may not be able to do anything about it.

Psychological and Mental Manipulative Techniques

Some of the methods of mental manipulation used by Common Purpose are:

Have a look at Creating a new political class – The ‘Great Brainwashed’ by Christopher Story and a video of him discussing the EU Collective here.

It is the manipulation of consensus that has turned the three main political parties in Britain into one party all standing on the same ground. They might offer slightly different policies – and only slightly – but they are all agreed on the fundamentals and this makes elections irrelevant.

This is an interesting read: Psychopolitics - the art and science of asserting and maintaining dominion over the thoughts and loyalties of individuals, officers, bureaus, and masses, and the effecting of the conquest of enemy nations through “mental healing.”

Problem – Reaction – Solution

A classic Common Purpose/New Labour-style ruse is to decide upon an objective, create a problem and then introduce a pre-planned ’solution’ to that problem. Straight from the Hegelian Dialectic – create the problem, manipulate the response, come up with the solution. Problem – reaction – solution. A solution which puts you in the position you wanted to be in in the first place but needed to create the problem in order to get there.

For example:

  • Problem: To allow EU police into Britain unhindered.
  • Reaction: Allow EU criminals into Britain unhindered.
  • Solution: Allow EU police into Britain unhindered.

Common Purpose Doublespeak

  • Equality means Inequality
  • Cohesion means Fragmentation
  • Diversity means Uniformity
  • Civic Society means Communism
  • Charity means Help the Rich
  • Common Purpose means Élite Control
  • Training means Brainwashing
  • Change means Chaos
  • Consensus means Dictatorship
  • Democracy means Corporate/State Control
  • Cultural Enrichment means Cultural Impoverishment

Leading Beyond Authority

A Common Purpose quote: “People who lead beyond their authority can produce change beyond their direct circle of control”.

The term ‘leading beyond authority’ refers to how Common Purpose deals with those people who are resistant to ‘change’ because of their inertia – not necessarily because they are actively hostile to Common Purpose. People whose inertia – such as the ‘we’ve always done it like this, why do we need to change’ types – are simply by-passed. Common Purpose finds it much more difficult to deal with those people who are actively hostile to them.

Read how Common Purpose counters resistance in their own words. Those actively hostile to Common Purpose are the ‘oncoming vehicle’ referred to in the article.

Leading beyond authority can mean acting ultra vires. Ultra vires a legal concept. It is Latin for ‘beyond the powers’. It can apply to any body which has rules, such as a charity or a local authority. An ultra vires act is one that is outside the specified and/or implied constitutional objects and powers of the body in question. It is ‘beyond the powers’ and therefore illegal.

Also, what are the implications of ‘leading beyond authority’ for services which require a hierarchical management structure to ensure discipline and cohesion, like the armed forces and police which can be manipulated from within for political purposes?

Common Purpose ‘graduates’ are incapable of leading by example because those people who have found out what they are up to do not trust them at all.

Common Purpose PC Brigade

Common Purpose are obsessive control freaks and manipulators. One of their main tools of social control, the Marxist doctrine of political correctness, is used to usurp dissenting voices and paralyse thought.

More Common Purpose Doublespeak

  • Consensus Building = Reaching a predetermined outcome through facilitated dialogue, often by ignoring, labeling, intimidating, ridiculing, or ignoring any form of dissent.
  • Critical Thinking = Criticizing and challenging traditional beliefs, values and authorities. Often uses ridicule, intimidation and rejection to conform people to the new paradigm.
  • Multicultural Education = Becoming a multicultural person, open to the pluralistic beliefs and lifestyles of all except those who cling to Christian values.
  • Conflict Resolution = Learning to synthesize beliefs and trade old absolute beliefs and values for compromise positions and a new set of absolutes.
  • Promoting Content Standards = Censorship.
  • World Citizen = New World Order stooge.

November 7, 2009

Random Nuremberg Nonsense

The Trial of German Major War Criminals

Sitting at Nuremberg, Germany

Sixty-Second Day: Tuesday, 19th February, 1946

Lev Nikolaivich Smirnov

“Trust Me, Comrades.”

COLONEL SMIRNOV [Смирнов, Лев Николаевич]:

“The medico-forensic experts’ report drawn up in the city of Smolensk has already been submitted to the Tribunal as Exhibit USSR 48. It was signed by a member of the Extraordinary State Commission, President of the Medical Academy and eminent Soviet physician, Academician Burdenko, by the principal medico-forensic expert of the Ministry of Health, Dr. Prozorovsky, and other experts. In addition to the final conclusions which have already been presented by my colleague, Colonel Pokrovsky, I now submit to the Tribunal the actual record of these experts’ investigation. From this the Tribunal will be able to judge, not only the final conclusion but also the methods used for this investigation. The Tribunal can see for itself the detailed description of each burial ground investigated by experts, as well as the detailed examination of the corpses exhumed from the ditches. … The experts describe a typical scene of a burial site of victims of German terror in 1941 and the beginning of 1942. I quote:

The ditches from which the corpses were exhumed were not common burial grounds. The corpses were not laid out in a row nor one next to the other, but layer upon layer, a solid mass of women’s and men’s bodies heaped together in confusion. In this mass of corpses some were bent or half bent, some were lying on their faces, on their sides, or on their backs, some were on their knees, with faces down or up, with legs and arms interlinked. It was impossible to separate the corpses before, they were exhumed from the ditch.

However, this chaotic manner of burial of the corpses appears to characterise only the mass burials of victims of the first mass shootings which were carried out toward the end of 1941 and the beginning of 1942.

During subsequent exhumations the medico-forensic experts discovered very many burial grounds where the corpses were laid down in orderly fashion, layer on layer. … The bodies are lying in regular layers….

“What was the reason for this regular laying out of the corpses? The Tribunal will find the answer to this on Page 290 of the document book, paragraph 8. This is a report of the Extraordinary State Commission on Atrocities committed by the German fascist invaders in the City and Region of Revno:

The witness Kapuk, a worker on a German farm near Belaya. Street, testified:

‘Several times I saw how the Hitlerites exterminated Soviet citizens, Ukrainians, Russians, Poles and Jews. This took place usually in, the following manner:

The German butchers brought the doomed people to the place of execution, forced them to dig a ditch, and ordered them to undress and to lie down in the ditch, face downward. The Hitlerites fired at the back of the necks of the victims with automatic pistols. Then another group of people lay down on top of the bodies of those shot and were finished off in the same manner, and then a third row, and so on until the ditch was filled. Then they poured quicklime over the corpses and covered them with earth.’

“How widespread this infamous and cruel method of mass execution was can be judged from an excerpt concerning the executions in Maidanek. I quote from a Soviet-Polish communique, already presented to the Tribunal as Exhibit USSR 29. The Tribunal will find this on Page 65 of the document book, paragraph 14:

On 3rd November, 1943, 18,400 people were shot in the camp. 8,400 came from the camp itself, and 10,000 were herded there from the city and other camps.

“I omit the next sentence [because it's probably even more obvious nonsense].

The shootings started early in the morning and ceased late in the evening. The S.S. brought the people, stripped naked, to the ditches in groups of fifty or one hundred. They were packed into the bottom of the ditch face down and shot with automatic rifles. Then a new group of people was piled on the corpses and shot in the same manner; and so on until the pits were full.

“The Hitlerite criminals, beginning with 1943, began to adopt different methods to cover the traces of their crimes, in particular, to burn the bodies. It has been proved by documents that the Hitlerites compelled their victims, first to prepare the kindlings, and logs, then to lie down on these wood piles. Then the first group was shot. The next party of condemned persons brought logs, laid them down on the layer of corpses, then lay down themselves on these logs, and were executed.

US Comrade Judge Samuel Leibowitz and USSR Comrade Judge Lev Smirnov

U.S. Comrade Judge Samuel Leibowitz & U.S.S.R. Comrade Judge Lev Smirnov. Comrade Smirnov explained why “loafers” were rightly deported to Siberia, 1959. Comrade Smirnov must have mellowed in his old age. Back in the 30’s he had people shot for less.

Commentary

Well, call me crazy, but I refuse to believe that hundreds of thousands of people (according to Col. L.N. Smirnov’s complete testimony just calmly walking into pits or climbed onto pyres and just lay down on top of corpses and waited to be shot and set on fire.

Col. Smirnov, Chief Counsellor of Justice for the USSR, also spouted the Jew-Fat-Soap nonsense, declaring to the Tribunal:

… The same base, rationalized SS technical minds which created gas chambers and murder vans, began devising such methods of complete annihilation of human bodies, which would not only conceal the traces of their crimes, but also to serve in the manufacturing of certain products. In the Danzig Anatomical Institute, semi-industrial experiments in the production of soap from human bodies and the tanning of human skin for industrial purposes were carried out.

Smirnov quoted from an affidavit by Sigmund Mazur [Nuremberg exhibit USSR-197], who allegedly alleged that Dr. Rudolf Spanner, the head of the Danzig Institute, had ordered the production of soap from corpses in 1943. According to Mazur’s affidavit, Dr. Spanner’s operation was of interest to high-ranking German officials. Education Minister Bernhard Rust and Health Leader Dr. Leonardo Conti, as well as professors from other medical institutes, came to witness Spanner’s efforts. Mazur also claimed to have used the “human soap” to wash himself and his laundry.

A human soap “recipe,” allegedly prepared by Dr. Spanner (Nuremberg document USSR-196), was also presented. Finally, a sample of what was supposed to be a piece of “human soap” was submitted to the Nuremberg Tribunal [exhibit USSR-393].

The Judeo-Soviet propagandist and racist hate-monger Ilya Ehrenburg wrote in his “memoir” [sic]:

“I have held in my hand a cake of soap stamped with the legend ‘pure Jewish soap’, prepared from the corpses of people who had been destroyed. But there is no need to speak of these things: thousands of books have been written about them.’”

Yes. “Legend” is a good word.

A standard Canadian high school history textbook, Canada: The Twentieth Century, terrorized impressionable Canadian youths that the evil sub-human German bastards “boiled” Jewish corpses “to make soap.”

The Masonic gangsters of the B’nai Brith’s defamatory Anti-Defamation League,  in their atrocity-porn booklet, “The Anatomy of Nazism,” satisfied the Jewish lust for tales of oppression by stating as Jewish gospel truth that “Large quantities of soap were manufactured from the corpses of those murdered.”

In 1943, the Soviet “Jewish Anti-Fascist Committee” went on a U.S. tour, raising more than two million dollars for their Uncle Joe. At each mass Judeo-Communist rally, Solomon Mikhoels showed the crowd a bar of soap that he said was made from Jewish corpses.

In 1948, four bars of this Jew-Fat-Soap were wrapped in a funeral shroud and ceremoniously buried according to Jewish religious ritual in a Haifa cemetery.

Oh, but wait …

Jewish historian Walter Laqueur, in 1980, “denied established history” by acknowledging in his book, The Terrible Secret, that the Jew-Fat-Soap legend has no basis in reality.

Gitta Sereny, another Jewish historian, noted in her book Into That Darkness:

“The universally accepted story that the corpses were used to make soap and fertilizer is finally refuted by the generally very reliable Ludwigsburg Central Authority for Investigation into Nazi Crimes.”

Establishment Holo-expert Deborah Lipstadt, a professor of modern Jewish history, similarly “rewrote history” in 1981:

“The fact is that the Nazis never used the bodies of Jews, or for that matter anyone else, for the production of soap.”

[BTW, who cares about "anyone else"?]

And in 1990, professor leading establishment Holohistorian Yehuda Bauer of Israel’s Hebrew University, and Shmuel Krakowski, archives director of Israel’s Yad Vashem Holocaust center, confirmed that the Jew-Fat-Soap story is a big fucking lie.

So, I guess Soviet Smirnov lied about the Jew-Fat-Soap, and the “Gas Chambers”, and the German nuking of Jews, and gigantic electric hot-plates, and the “Steam  Chambers”, and all the rest of the atrocity porn, as well as blaming the Soviet slaughter at Katyn on innocent Nazis, but he cannot tell a lie about mass-shootings. Of course he did show up in “court” with photos of people who’d ben shot and set on fire. I wonder if they were brave German soldiers murdered by the Reds? I guess we’ll never know.

November 7, 2009

The Best Nigger Speech Ever

What else can you call it?

I was just reviewing this oldie but goodie. Was there ever a more slavish political speech (besides praise for dictators from subjects who feared for their lives)?

By the way, the use of the word nigger is in no way a reference to Obama’s inheritance from Frank Marshall Davis. The nigger I am referring to is The United States of America. The use of this word is in no way intended to offend. It is merely the best word to describe America’s relationship to its obvious master.

Obama AIPAC

Before enjoying the speech, here’s some of the appreciation it earned:

Barack Obama, AIPAC Conference, 2008.06.04:

Today I’ll be speaking from my heart, and as a true friend of Israel. And I know that when I visit with AIPAC, I am among friends. Good friends. Friends who share my strong commitment to make sure that the bond between the United States and Israel is unbreakable today, tomorrow, and forever.

The bond between Israel and the United States is rooted in more than our shared national interests – it’s rooted in the shared values and shared stories of our people. And as President, I will work with you to ensure that it this bond strengthened.

I first became familiar with the story of Israel when I was eleven years old. I had grown up without a sense of roots. In many ways, I didn’t know where I came from. So I was drawn to the belief that you could sustain a spiritual, emotional and cultural identity. And I deeply understood the Zionist idea – that there is always a homeland at the center of our story.

I also learned about the horror of the Holocaust. [WW2 is a footnote to the Holoco$t.] We must mean what we say when we speak the words: “never again.”

We know that the establishment of Israel was just and necessary, rooted in centuries of struggle, and decades of patient work. But 60 years later, we know that we cannot relent, we cannot yield, and as President I will never compromise when it comes to Israel’s security.

America is more isolated in the region, reducing our strength and jeopardizing Israel’s safety. Those who threaten Israel threaten us. I will bring to the White House an unshakeable commitment to Israel’s security.

I will ensure that Israel can defend itself from any threat – from Gaza to Tehran. Defense cooperation between the United States and Israel is a model of success, and must be deepened. As President, I will implement a Memorandum of Understanding that provides $30 billion in assistance to Israel over the next decade – investments to Israel’s security that will not be tied to any other nation. First, we must approve the foreign aid request for 2009. Going forward, we can enhance our cooperation on missile defense. We should export military equipment to our ally Israel under the same guidelines as NATO.

Israel’s security is sacrosanct. It is non-negotiable. Any agreement with the Palestinian people must preserve Israel’s identity as a Jewish state. Jerusalem will remain the capital of Israel [n.b. U.S. citizens born in Jerusalem do not have "Israel" written on their passports as their country of birth, but rather "Jerusalem"], and it must remain undivided.

Israel is strong enough to achieve peace, if it has partners who are committed to the goal. The United States must never force Israel to the negotiating table.

There is no greater threat to Israel – or to the peace and stability of the region – than Iran. The enemies of Israel should have no doubt that, regardless of party, Americans stand shoulder-to-shoulder in our commitment to Israel’s security. The Iranian regime challenges us across the region. Its President denies the Holocaust and threatens to wipe Israel off the map. The danger from Iran is grave, it is real, and my goal will be to eliminate this threat.

We will use all elements of American power to pressure Iran. We have no time to waste. We will present a clear choice. If you abandon your dangerous nuclear program, support for terror, and threats to Israel, there will be meaningful incentives – including the lifting of sanctions, and political and economic integration with the international community. If you refuse, we will ratchet up the pressure. We should pursue unilateral sanctions that target Iranian banks and assets. We should work with Europe, Japan and the Gulf states to find every avenue outside the UN to isolate the Iranian regime – from cutting off loan guarantees and expanding financial sanctions, to banning the export of refined petroleum to Iran.

Finally, let there be no doubt: I will always keep the threat of military action on the table to defend our ally Israel.

I will make known to allies and adversaries alike that America maintains an unwavering friendship with Israel, and an unshakeable commitment to its security.

As members of AIPAC, you have helped advance this bipartisan consensus to support and defend our ally Israel. And I am sure that today on Capitol Hill you will be meeting with members of Congress and spreading the word. We are here because the values we hold dear are deeply embedded in the story of Israel.

There is a commitment embedded in the Jewish faith and tradition: to freedom and fairness; to social justice and equal opportunity. To tikkun olam the obligation to repair this world.

We must not allow the relationship between Jews and African Americans to suffer. This is a bond that must be strengthened. Together, we can rededicate ourselves to end prejudice and combat hatred in all of its forms. Together, we can renew our commitment to justice. Together, we can join our voices together, and in doing so make even the mightiest of walls fall down [except Israeli walls].

That work must include our shared commitment to Israel. You and I know that we must do more than stand still. Now is the time to be vigilant in facing down every foe, just as we move forward in seeking a future of peace for the children of Israel, and for all children. Now is the time to stand by Israel as it writes the next chapter in its extraordinary journey. Now is the time to join together in the work of repairing this world.

Israel will triumph and America will fall.

American tax-payers should just give Israel money and shut up.

No Choice

It’s not like Americans have any choices regarding their enslavement to Israel. John “USS No Liberty” McCain, at the same kow-tow session:

“We [U.S. & Israel] are the most natural of allies, and like Israel itself, that alliance is forever.”

George Washington:

A passionate attachment of one nation for another produces a variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite nation, facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common interest in cases where no real common interest exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the other, betrays the former into a participation in the quarrels and wars of the latter without adequate inducement or justification. It leads also to concessions to the favorite nation of privileges denied to others which is apt doubly to injure the nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily parting with what ought to have been retained, and by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted, or deluded citizens (who devote themselves to the favorite nation), facility to betray or sacrifice the interests of their own country, without odium, sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a commendable deference for public opinion, or a laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish compliances of ambition, corruption, or infatuation.

As avenues to foreign influence in innumerable ways, such attachments are particularly alarming to the truly enlightened and independent patriot. How many opportunities do they afford to tamper with domestic factions, to practice the arts of seduction, to mislead public opinion, to influence or awe the public councils.

Against the insidious wiles of foreign influence (I conjure you to believe me, fellow-citizens) the jealousy of a free people ought to be constantly awake, since history and experience prove that foreign influence is one of the most baneful foes of republican government. … Excessive partiality for one foreign nation and excessive dislike of another cause those whom they actuate to see danger only on one side, and serve to veil and even second the arts of influence on the other.

Real patriots who may resist the intrigues of the favorite are liable to become suspected and odious, while its tools and dupes usurp the applause and confidence of the people, to surrender their interests.

The great rule of conduct for us in regard to foreign nations is in extending our commercial relations, to have with them as little political connection as possible.

Our detached and distant situation invites and enables us to pursue a different course. If we remain one people under an efficient government, the period is not far off when we may defy material injury from external annoyance; when we may take such an attitude as will cause the neutrality we may at any time resolve upon to be scrupulously respected; when belligerent nations, under the impossibility of making acquisitions upon us, will not lightly hazard the giving us provocation; when we may choose peace or war, as our interest, guided by justice, shall counsel.

Why forego the advantages of so peculiar a situation? Why quit our own to stand upon foreign ground?


It is our true policy to steer clear of permanent alliances with any portion of the foreign world.

Marcus Tullius Cicero

A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murderer is less to fear.

November 7, 2009

The Masons Who Stare At Goats

Freemasons Who Stare At Goats Pyramid Baphomet

George Obama Clooney staring at Baphomet with Pyramid

The Men Who Stare At Goats is quite a funny romp, about poor, beleaguered Freemasons (never so named) fighting the forces of evil who control the government and media. (Judeo-Masonic split?) The poor Masons do their best to promote dope, Hinduism, a world army, world government, ZOGUSA hegemony, war is peace, liberté, egalité, fraternité… The media control, and torture and brainwashing schemes such as MK-ULTRA, are portrayed as the work of those who have betrayed the “true, noble” Masonic plan. Interesting also to see the spin on Lucas’ Ziomasonic Jedi cult.

Masons Who Stare At Goats Pyramids

Plenty of pyramids, pentagrams.

Masons of Texas rates it as “awesome”, and “a huge nugget of gold.”

Kosher Symbol

The movie is based on the book of the same name by Jon Ronson, a British Judeo-Mason.

Ronson also wrote, Them: Adventures with Extremists, is a great disinfo effeort, in which Ronson lampoons Randy Weaver, David Icke, Omar Bakri Muhammad, Ian Paisley, and Thom Robb as deluded, paranoid “extremists”. Ronson pretends to infiltrate (in vain) “shadowy cabals” like the Bilderbergers, and concludes that these Satanic cabals are no big deal. Them: Adventures with Extremists is alo now getting the Hollyjewed treatment, under producer and Christ-satirist Jack Black (who led the audience at the last MTV awards in an open prayer to Satan), screenwriter Mike White (School of Rock, The Good Girl), and director Edgar Wright (Shaun of the Dead).

Masons Who Stare At Goats 001

Much of The Men Who Stare At Goats is based on Lt. Col. Jim Channon’s 1979 First Earth Battalion Operations Manual.

Ronson makes a career out of mocking Christianity and “conspiracy nuts”.

men-who-stare-at-goats

Ronson’s Documentaries:

  • The Ronson Mission [BBC 2, 1994]
  • New York To California: A Great British Odyssey [Channel 4, 1996]
  • Hotel Auschwitz [Channel 4, 1996]
  • Tottenham Ayatollah [Channel 4, 1997]
  • Critical Condition [Channel 4, 1997]
  • Dr Paisley, I Presume [Channel 4, 1998]
  • New Klan [Channel 4, 1999]
  • Secret Rulers of the World [Channel 4, 2001]
  • The Double Life of Jonathan King [Channel 4, 2002]
  • Kidneys for Jesus [Channel 4, 2003]
  • I Am, Unfortunately, Randy Newman [Channel 4, 2004]
  • Crazy Rulers of the World [Channel 4, 2004]
  • Death in Santaland [More 4, 2007]
  • Reverend Death [Channel 4, 2008]
  • Stanley Kubrick’s Boxes [2008]
  • Revelations [2009]

Masons Who Stare At Goats 02

A chapter from “Dem”:

Who pulls the strings?

Jon Ronson

At the National Press Club on Pennsylvania Avenue, Washington DC, Big Jim Tucker left a coded message on the answer-machine of a friend. “Mother. Your dutiful son is playing kick the can on Pennsylvania Avenue, Tuesday morning, 10.30am, thank you.”

Big Jim replaced the telephone receiver. He lit a cigarette and glanced around the lobby with a routine vigilance. Even here at his club, his gentleman’s club, he considered himself not entirely safe. Anyone could discover that this was where he had breakfast every day: three strong black coffees and some pastries on the side.

“If they ever got me,” he said, “they’d make it look like a typical Washington mugging. A mugging on the sidewalk. Killed for a couple of dollars. Another three paragraphs in the newspaper.”

Jim paused. He pulled on his cigarette. His heart is not strong due to his habit of smoking unfiltered Camels at all times, pack after pack. He is quite huge, an elderly southern gentleman in a crumpled suit and a newshound trilby. He has a voice like gravel (a result of cigarette-induced emphysema, which, by a happy accident, gives his speech an enigmatic rhythm, like a charismatic Sam Spade down on his luck) and an office downtown with Venetian blinds.

He said, “The thing is, we don’t know how much time we’ve got left. And suppose I just so happen to ‘drop dead’ in my office on Tuesday afternoon. It could be the following Monday before someone says, ‘Where is that boy?’ I don’t want to be burnt bacon when they find me. I guess I’m just too vain to be found that way.”

Big Jim laughed in a hollow manner. “So I phone my friend every day just to announce I’m still kicking the can and still hunting the macaroon. Still breathing, see? The day she doesn’t get that call is the day she makes enquiries.”

Here at his private members’ club, Big Jim could pass for a venerable commentator for a heavyweight daily newspaper, but he isn’t. He works for an underground journal called the Spotlight. Mainstream journalists keep away from him. This is, Jim said, because certain high-ranking members of the overground media, even some members of his own club, are in league with the secret rulers of the world. And it is they who would make his death look like a typical Washington mugging.

When I began hearing about the Bilderberg Group – about the notion that a tiny band of insidious and clandestine powermongers meet in a secret room from which they rule the world – I was sceptical. But I kept hearing about them, and I finally decided to try to settle the matter once and for all. Which is why I visited Big Jim Tucker. Within anti-Bilderberg circles, Big Jim is considered a pioneer, a trailblazer, risking his life to attempt to locate the geographical whereabouts of the secret room.

“They exist all right,” said Big Jim, “and they’re not playing pinochle in there.” Big Jim Tucker has spent 30 years documenting the facts. He’s been after them since the 70s when he first got the hunch that they existed. He abandoned a good career in sports journalism on a big city paper. It has been cat and mouse ever since, he said. Good against evil.

“Those sick luminaries are always on the move,” said Jim. “They never come together in the same place twice, so as to evade detection. They only meet once a year, for a long weekend in May or June.”

They have been ruling the world in secret since 1954, Jim said, when a man called Joseph Retinger, whose name rarely appears in the history books, decided to create them. One of many mysteries is how Retinger – a Polish immigrant employed as secretary to the novelist Joseph Conrad – had the wherewithal and the contacts to organise such a mighty endeavour. Their first meeting took place in the Bilderberg Hotel, Holland, which is why the secret rulers of the world go by the name of the Bilderberg Group. Big Jim said that I happened to have caught him at a very good time. He was ready to take things further, to turn up the heat and cause some trouble.

“So you’ve actually managed to obtain the address of the next Bilderberg meeting?” I asked Jim.

“Yes, sir,” he said.

“You know exactly where it is?” I asked.

“Yes, I do,” he said.

Big Jim said he fully intended to thwart their security and barge in unannounced to catch them red-handed going about their covert wickedness. I was welcome to tag along, he said, “Just so long as you don’t step on twigs or fall off walls while we’re on the prowl.

“The plan is this,” said Jim. “We’ll leave Washington on the last day of May, and we’ll arrive at the target destination on the Sunday morning. We’ll start patrolling that same afternoon. Patrol Sunday and Monday. Develop sources. Waiters, chambermaids . . .”

“So they still meet in hotels?” I said.

“Yes, sir,” said Jim. “The chambermaids will be gun-shy at first. They’ll know something big and spooky is going on, but they won’t know what. But then they’ll begin to realise that whatever’s happening at their hotel is evil. And that’s when they’ll open up.”

“So what else will we do on the Sunday and Monday?”

“Scout around the resort. Figure out ways to penetrate.”

“Scout around looking for what?”

“Where the short wall is,” said Jim. “Where the big drainpipe is.”

“So we’ll actually be climbing up drainpipes?” I asked.

“Climbing up drainpipes,” said Jim, “trying not to sneeze or cough or step on twigs. Trying to avoid the guard dogs.”

“What’s the name of the hotel?”

“I’ve – uh – got it written down here somewhere,” said Jim. He riffled through his pockets. “Here it is. The Caesar Park golfing resort, Sintra, Portugal.”

I looked quizzically at Jim. “Are you sure about all of this?”

“They are evil and their evil occurs in the dark shadows,” replied Jim, emphatically. “Behind closed doors. Ruling the world from a room. Imagine that. Let’s get a drink.”

Jim took me to the Men’s Bar upstairs. We drank beers and watched sport on the TV above the bar. Framed front pages of big news stories of days gone by lined the walls. “War in the Persian Gulf!” “Thatcher Resigns!” Jim said that both acts were orchestrated by Bilderberg. “Margaret Thatcher is one of the good guys,” said Jim. “Bilderberg ordered her to dismantle British sovereignty, but she said no way, so they had her sacked.”

Big Jim said he once found himself at a drinks party with Thatcher and he took the opportunity to sidle up to her. “How does it feel to have been denounced by those Bilderberg boys, ma’am?” he growled. She whispered back that she considered it a “great tribute to be denounced by Bilderberg”.

I considered the significance of the endeavour we were about to undertake. For the other people I had met, Bilderberg was an inviolable almighty. Big Jim was the first man to have the tenacity to discover the address, and to plan on going in, and damn the consequences. This might change everything. Jim wouldn’t tell me how he discovered the room’s whereabouts, but a few moments later, as we sat at the bar, a tall man with a moustache bounded over and cheerfully introduced himself to me as Jim’s mole from inside Bilderberg.

“I’m an accountant,” he explained. “Some very big clients use our firm. One guy happened to mention to me that he was on his way to somewhere near Lisbon in June for a very private meeting.”

Jim appeared a little annoyed by his mole’s instantaneous candour, but then he shrugged and joined in with the story. “We know,” said Jim, “that the Bilderberg Group always meet in May or June.”

“So Jim,” said the mole, “started telephoning every five-star hotel near Lisbon.”

“They always meet at a five-star hotel with golfing facilities,” explained Jim.

“Always golfing facilities?” I asked.

Jim picked up on my subtext at once. “Believe me,” he said, “they’re not there to play golf. They’re too busy starting wars.”

“They may play golf when they’re there,” clarified the mole, “but they’re not there to play golf.”

“Okay,” I said.

“So,” said Jim, “I finally got around to calling a hotel up in the hills, and I said to the receptionist, ‘I’ve been invited to the Bilderberg conference in June, but I’m afraid I’ve been very silly and lost my invitation. Could you confirm that this is the correct venue?’ And she said, ‘Why, of course, sir. Oh yes, sir. This is exactly where you’re supposed to be, and we’re very much looking forward to serving you.’ “

Jim and his mole laughed. A nearby barfly heard their laughter and came over to join us. Jim and his mole stopped laughing. They turned their backs on the new guy and myself. There was a moment’s awkwardness.

“So what’s all this about?” asked the new guy.

“Well,” I whispered, “that big old man in the trilby has tracked down the tiny group of people who rule the world in secret. Anyway, the two of us are going to Portugal next week to confront them.”

“Oh, right,” he said, unimpressed. “What do they do, these secret rulers of the world?”

I shrugged. “Everything, I guess,” I said. “They’re called the Bilderberg Group.”

“Can’t say I’ve heard of them,” he said.

“Jim’s dedicated his life to exposing them,” I said.

“It’s not so surprising that I’ve never heard of them,” said the new guy. He scanned the room. Every bar stool was occupied. Retired newsmen in suits stared into their beer glasses. The Men’s Bar seemed to be where the Washington press corps went when there were no more deadlines, no stories left to file. “It’s not so surprising,” he said. “Pretty much everyone here has dedicated his life to something or other that nobody’s ever heard of.”

The next morning, Jim took me to the office of the Spotlight, just around the corner from Capitol Hill. It is pristine from the outside, gleaming white, on a lovely tree-lined street. But it is dark and dusty inside, and there are boxes everywhere. He introduced me to Andy, his editor. We sat in the courtyard and drank iced tea. “Jon,” said Jim to Andy, “thinks those Bilderberg boys are just playing pinochle in there.”

“Well, first off,” said Andy, impatiently, “you get a lot of people, including newspaper editors, who say there is no Bilderberg Group, that it doesn’t even exist.”

“They’ve kept the vow of silence like they’re going to nun school,” said Jim.

“This is after you’ve had Prince Charles attend,” said Andy. “This is after you’ve had Bill Clinton attend. And still people say it doesn’t exist. Not that it’s just a social meeting, but that it doesn’t exist.”

“If they’re just going to play golf and swap lies and chase girls,” said Jim, “why the armed guards? Know what I’m saying?”

“They exist all right,” said Andy.

“Prince Charles and Bill Clinton,” explained Jim, “are small-fry. The rulers of the world are the ones who do the inviting. The steering committee. Clinton was just a small-fry from somewhere called Arkansas when he got his invitation back in ‘91. Yeah, they had big plans for that boy.”

“You be careful,” said Andy. “You’re dealing with dangerous forces.”

***

“Mother,” said Big Jim Tucker, “your dutiful son is playing hunt the macaroon at the Paris Hotel, Portugal, Monday morning, 10.30am, thank you.”

It was a week later, and our first working day in Portugal. Our plan was to scout the target five-star golfing resort situated six miles north, develop sources and look for the short wall and the big drainpipe in preparation for the midnight penetration later in the week. Jim lay back on his bed. Our hotel was built on a busy roundabout. The ocean glistened in the distance, beyond a railway track and a couple of main roads. Even up here on the sixth floor you could hear the never-ending roar of the traffic.

“Unlike the Bilderberg luminaries,” said Jim, ruefully, scanning the dirty walls of this bad hotel, “some of us are working on a tight budget.” Jim lit a Camel. He is a large, elderly man, and I am not athletic. Our agility levels were impeded by our smoking habits, and we wheezed in the Portuguese heat. I was unsure as to how successful the two of us would be in climbing up drainpipes. I pictured slapstick scenarios that would be hilarious to onlookers but not to us.

Jim was acting breezily, but I could sense his nervousness. “I’m a quarterback,” he said, “gearing up for the Superbowl.”

By Jim’s reckoning, the Bilderberg Group was not scheduled to arrive in Portugal until Wednesday night. He said he had heard reports that their private security guards had already set up camp at the Caesar Park and were planning to operate a shoot-to-kill policy for all penetrators. This somewhat diminished the potential for slapstick hilarity. I was not feeling cocksure.

We had that morning fruitlessly scanned the news-stands for references to the meeting. “Surprise, surprise,” growled Jim. “Media black-out.”

There was, however, one notable exception. The Weekly News, a tiny English-language parish newspaper, circulation 8,000, for Algarve tourist workers and regular English visitors such as Sir Cliff Richard, had gone big on the story. Very big: “As speculation on the internet runs rife, the News checks it out and it does seem that . . . secret world government group is meeting here!”

The Weekly News made me feel less vulnerable down here on the ground. Jim said he wanted to touch base with its editorial team later in the week. “If the Weekly News boys can help us expose those Bilderberg jackasses,” he said, “I’m all for pooling information.”

I had rented a car from Budget. We drove into the mountains, away from the boisterous, good-time package-tour Estoril, towards the more serene and ancient pastures of Sintra, seven miles up the road. On the way, we discussed cover stories in case we incurred suspicion. We elected to be holidaymakers, getting a drink at the poolside bar because we’d heard so many good things about the resort, which was undoubtedly the finest around.

The Caesar Park is situated three miles from the main Estoril-Sintra road – two and a half miles down a narrow country lane, through the wilderness of a national park, followed by another half-mile private driveway. It became evident, as we approached the big peach gates that led into the resort, that the midnight penetration would be an even more formidable task than we had anticipated. The hotel is surrounded on all sides by dense undergrowth and sheer mountains. Jim silently pondered these obstacles from the passenger seat. He photographed the mountains. We drove through the gates (the gatekeeper let us in with a wave) and down the half-mile-long driveway. And then the hotel appeared – a peach-coloured resort of purpose-built luxury.

“The civilians haven’t been shifted out yet,” muttered Jim, as we left the car and wandered towards the colossal marble reception area. Jim whipped out his camera and photographed the tourists. These photographs would later appear in the Spotlight as “unaware civilians”.

We were not inconspicuous, Jim and I, strolling around the Caesar Park in our open-necked shirts. We were, in fact, an unlikely holidaymaking duo. At a very big push, Jim could resemble a benevolent, wealthy, southern sugar daddy and I his gawky, early-30s toy-boy. But I doubted the persuasiveness of the scenario. “I don’t think,” I murmured, as we wandered out to the swimming pool, “that the holidaymaking cover is a convincing one. I think we should think of something else.”

“We’re salesmen,” said Jim. “We’re just salesmen getting lunch.”

“What do we sell?” I asked.

“We don’t like to talk business when we’re having lunch,” said Jim.

We sat on stools at the poolside bar. Unaware young women sunbathed in bikinis.

“Ma’am,” said Jim to a young passing waitress, bowing slightly, his newshound trilby now replaced by a tourist’s straw sunhat, “I’m a little confused. I tried to book a room here for Thursday, and they told me that the whole hotel had been closed down for some big meeting. Must be a pretty damned big important meeting if you ask me . . .”

The waitress shrugged. “I don’t know,” she said. She smiled slightly and left us.

Jim got out his notepad. He wrote notes and then he read them out to me:

Dateline Portugal

Tension filled the air inside the posh Caesar Park resort on Monday. At the poolside bar, the pretty barmaid’s face filled with tension when asked to speculate on the big important meeting taking place from Thursday. She shrugged her shoulders and feigned ignorance, but the tension on her face spoke volumes.

Jim put down his notepad. “Is that accurate?” he said.

“I don’t know,” I said.”We may be imbuing her with our own feelings of tension.”

“Still,” said Jim, finishing his iced tea, “now we know what the drinks of the rich taste like.”

We paid and patrolled the resort some more. I was disappointed with the Caesar Park, its Eurotrashy aircraft-hangar spaces, its cold approximation of luxury. The lobby shops have names such as “Fashionable”. I would have assumed that Bilderberg would meet somewhere classier. Jim explained that I still hadn’t quite got it. They are not there for classy holidaying. They are there to start wars. Also, Jim added, there is a finite number of international hotels that can transform themselves into walled fortresses, that have their own helicopter pads and nearby military air bases.

Jim and I split up. I looked at the prints on the wall outside the upstairs bar. A half-hour passed. I wandered aimlessly through the lobbies and the bars. There were other aimless wanderers, too: a woman in a red dress and a man in his 30s wearing a tweed jacket. It struck me that we all seemed to be wandering aimlessly in some kind of unison, but it didn’t cross my mind – right up until the moment that the man in the tweed jacket marched across the room and began questioning me in an angry whisper – that I was being tailed.

“We’ve watched you for an hour. I’m the hotel manager. You take pictures. You ask questions about some big important meeting. Who are you?”

“I . . .” I paused. Then I clumsily announced, “I’m from England.” It was the only thing I could think of. This works, of course, in other circumstances abroad. But it didn’t work here.

“What do you want?”

I stared blankly at him.

“What is your business here?”

I continued to stare blankly. And then another man appeared. This new man was older, with a tan, and he spoke with a smooth European accent. “It’s okay!” he laughed. “Everything’s fine! There’s no problem!” He gave the hotel manager’s shoulder a little squeeze. “I am your servant,” he said to me. “If there’s anything you’d like, please be my guest. Think of this hotel as your home. If I can be of any service to you, any service whatsoever, don’t hesitate to ask.”

I glanced over with anxiety at the hotel manager, who was now standing a little way off; overruled, slighted and silent. “I mean,” he smiled, “what could you possibly be doing here that could cause any harm to anybody?”

“Are you . . .” I paused. There was something indistinctly alarming about the things he was saying to me. I could not imagine that he really did want me to think of this hotel as my home. So why did he say that? I presume, in retrospect, that the message he was sending to me was: “We have noticed you, you are not welcome, but we are allowing you to leave without incident, just so long as you don’t come back.” At the time, however, the message I picked up was: “I am extremely sinister and powerful. This is so evident that I can afford to feign generous subservience.”

“Are you with the Caesar Park?” I asked the charming man.

“Oh, no,” he laughed. “No, I am not with the hotel. So, as I say, think of this hotel as your home. Really, everything’s fine and there’s no problem. What problems could there be?”

What problems could there be? I wanted the young hotel manager to intervene. I suddenly felt that he could be my ally in this situation. But he remained impassive.

“Don’t feel as if you have to go,” said the charming man, his arms outstretched. “Stay as long as you like. Enjoy the facilities. Have a swim!”

“So if you’re not with the hotel,” I said, “who are you with?”

“I am with . . .” he paused “. . . another organisation.”

“Which is called . . .?”

He laughed and looked at the ground. “Enjoy your afternoon,” he said.

I waited for Jim down in the lobby, right by the revolving doors that led outside to the car park. The hotel manager stood nearby, watching me with a constant, even gaze. After five minutes, Jim ambled towards us. When he noticed the hotel manager, he slowed his gait to the laziest of strolls – a little gesture of southern gentlemanly defiance.

There was something new in the car park now, a dozen police motorcycles lined up by the revolving doors. “The big shut-down is beginning,” whispered Jim. He pulled out his camera and photographed the police. “We’re lucky,” he said. “An hour later, we wouldn’t have gotten near the place.”

“What did that man say to you?” I asked.

“Oh,” said Jim, “he would just love to be of service and provide any help I needed, blah blah blah.”

“How can you say blah blah blah?” I said. “That wasn’t blah blah blah. That was actually fucking sinister.”

“Those Bilderberg boys can be pretty sinister,” said Jim. We climbed into our car. I started the engine.

“So I told him that I didn’t need any help wandering around the hotel, thank you all the same,” said Jim. “Then he asked where we were staying . . .”

“Did he?”

“And I said, ‘Oh, just some flea-pit down the road.’”

***

That evening, when I went for dinner, I put a sliver of paper in the crack between my hotel room door and the frame, as I had seen James Coburn do in Our Man Flint. Actually, Coburn put a single hair in his door. But my door crack was too large for single hairs, and they kept falling on to the floor and disappearing into the carpet. I was standing there in the corridor tugging my hair out. So I switched to a sliver of paper. When I returned from dinner, the sliver was still there. There was always a possibility, of course, that they’d taken a look around and put the sliver back where they’d found it. I slept fitfully that night, but nothing happened.

“Mother.” It was Tuesday morning. Jim was leaving his regular answerphone message with his friend back in Washington DC to confirm he had not been murdered during the previous 24 hours. “Your dutiful son is playing kick the can in Portugal. Thank you very much.” This was supposed to be an easy day. Jim simply wanted to verify that the complete shut-down of the Caesar Park had been accomplished. We would drive up there and be turned away at the gate. Jim would ask why, for the record, and document the response in his notepad. Then we would turn around and drive back to our hotel for a leisurely afternoon by the pool and in the bar.

But this was not to be. We arrived at the Caesar Park to discover no police, no cordon, no shut-down. The gatekeeper lifted the barrier and waved us on with a cheerful smile. For the first time, Jim appeared sidestepped. “That’s surprising,” he admitted. “That’s surprising already.”

“Do we drive in?”

“I’m confounded,” murmured Jim. “We saw the shut-down begin yesterday. We saw it with our own eyes. And now no shut-down. This is not what’s supposed to happen.”

The gatekeeper approached the car. “Just drive in,” said Jim urgently. Impulsively, I took my foot off the brake and we cruised up the drive. This was a disconcerting new twist. We were venturing into a place where it had been made perfectly clear that we were not welcome, and we didn’t even want to be there. We were accidental agents provocateurs, simply because we had been waved on at the gate.

“The hotel is deserted,” I said, as we pulled into the car park. “We’re the only people here.”

“Let’s get lunch,” said Jim. “Just two guys getting lunch.”

We wandered through the now-deserted marble lobby. There were no more civilians. We walked out into the silent grounds and sat at the poolside bar, the only two customers in a hotel designed for thousands. A young waitress appeared.

“Ma’am,” said Jim, raising his trilby.

“Sir?” she said.

“What time do you get off work?”

The question seemed to startle her.

“Nine o’clock,” she said, cautiously.

“And what bars do you like drinking in?” said Jim.

“There are some nice bars in the village near the cathedral.”

“Any bars in particular?” Jim laughed. “Don’t worry. I’m buying.”

“Just lots of nice bars in the village,” she said, evenly.

“That’s good information,” said Jim. “Thank you, ma’am,” he called after her.

He turned to me. “Now we know where the waiting staff drink. Could be good contacts.”

“So,” I said, “shall we try the bars near the cathedral?”

“Sure,” he said.

“Will we go, then?”

“Okay,” said Jim.

We walked back to the car and began driving the half-mile towards the exit. I glanced into my rear-view mirror. A dark green Lancia had pulled out behind us.

“Jim,” I said.

“Mmm?”

“I think we’re being followed.”

Jim turned around. “No shit,” he grinned. “Don’t worry. Once we’re on the public highway, they’d be pretty foolish to try anything.”

“Okay,” I said.

“They’re not going to want to have a fat old dead reporter on the side of the road,” said Jim. “That’s too big a news story.”

“Okay,” I said.

“But here they could say, ‘Oh, we thought they were armed. They looked threatening. We told them to stop but they didn’t stop.’ Bango!”

“I get the picture,” I said.

A flock of geese wandered idly up the drive in front of me. I honked my horn. We finally reached the peach gates.

“You watch,” said Jim. “He’ll turn around now. He’s done his job. Poor fool.”

But the Lancia didn’t turn around. It began to follow us down the deserted lane.

“Uh oh,” said Jim.

***

“British Embassy.”

“Okay,” I said, “I’m a journalist from London. I’m calling you on the road from Sintra to Estoril . . .”

“Hold on.”

“Press office.”

“I’m a journalist from London,” I said. “I’m calling you on the road from Sintra to Estoril. I’m being tailed, right now, by a dark green Lancia belonging to the Bilderberg Group.”

There was a sharp intake of breath. “Go on,” she said.

“I’m sorry,” I said, “but I just heard you take a sharp breath.”

“Bilderberg?” she said.

“Yes,” I said. “They watched us scouting around the Caesar Park Hotel and they’ve been following us ever since. We have now been followed for three hours. I wasn’t sure at first, so I stopped my car on the side of a deserted lane and he stopped his car right in front of us. Can you imagine just how chilling that moment was? This is especially disconcerting because I’m from England and I’m not used to being spied on.”

“Do you have Bilderberg’s permission to be in Portugal?” she said. “Do they know you are here?”

“No,” I said.

“Bilderberg are very secretive,” she said. “They don’t want people looking into their business. What are you doing here?”

“I am essentially a humorous journalist,” I explained. “I am a humorous journalist out of my depth. Do you think it might help if we tell them that?”

From the corner of my eye, I saw Jim wind down his window. He leant his head out and blew an antagonising lady-like kiss at the Lancia.

“Hold on a second,” I said. “Jim!” I said, sternly. “Please stop that.” I lowered my voice. “I’m here with an American,” I said, “called Big Jim Tucker. He’s an agent provocateur. That might be the problem. Perhaps you can phone Bilderberg and explain that I may be in the car with Jim Tucker, but I’m not actually with him.”

“Listen”‘ she said, urgently, “Bilderberg is much bigger than we are. We’re very small. We’re just a little embassy. Do you understand? They’re way out of our league. All I can say is go back to your hotel and sit tight.”

“I’m actually just pulling into our hotel car park right now. The Paris Hotel in Estoril. He’s right behind me. He’s pulling up on the street right next to the hotel. He’s getting out of his car . . .” “Sit tight,” she said. “I’ll make some phone calls. Whatever happens, don’t incite them in any way. Don’t fan the flames.”

Before the chase had begun, Jim was lumbering and supine. Now he jumped out of the car with the agility of a young deer. The man from the Lancia climbed out of his car and took up a position behind a tree. He was young, in his 30s, with short black hair. He wore sunglasses and a dark green suit.

“I can see you!” sang Jim. “You’re behind the tree. Peek-a-boo! Smile pretty for my idiot-proof camera.”

“Jim,” I said, “will you stop that.”

But everything was beyond my control. It was as if the invigoration of the chase had transformed Jim into a sprightly teenager.

A one-sided game of peek-a-boo ensued, during which the chaser maintained a steely expression behind his sunglasses, Jim performed a little ballet dance, and I sidled towards the swimming-pool area, attempting to distance myself from the unfolding crisis. Jim wandered over to me.

“Am I being paranoid,” he said, “or did Bilderberg set a trap for us? No, listen. Yesterday, we saw the shut-down begin. We saw it with our own eyes. Today, surprise surprise, no shut-down. They let us in with a smile . . .” Jim trailed off.

Jim said he needed a lie down. He may have twisted something when he leapt out of the car. He retired to his bedroom. I sat by the pool. The man behind the tree shrugged and paced around and adjusted his tie and busied himself there behind the tree. Holidaymakers splashed all around us. From time to time I made eye contact with the chaser, which meant, “Can I come over and tell you who we are and what is going on?” But he waved me away with a flick of his hand.

Sandra from the British Embassy called me back to say that she had spoken to the Bilderberg office at the Caesar Park and they said that nobody was following us and how could they call off someone who didn’t exist?

“He is,” I said, in a staccato whisper, “behind the tree.”

“The good news,” said Sandra, “is if you know you’re being followed, they’re probably just trying to intimidate you. The dangerous ones would be those you don’t know are following you.”

But this was scant comfort. What if these men were the dangerous ones, and I just happened to be naturally good at spotting them? What if I was adept at this?

“But that isn’t logical,” I said. “Big Jim Tucker is obviously not intimidated. I don’t think they’d waste their time trying to intimidate us when it is quite obviously failing.”

“You sound a little intimidated, if you don’t mind me saying,” said Sandra.

Two hours passed. Jim and I reconvened at a hotel bar down the road. As I wandered through the lobby, two men in dark suits immediately grabbed brochures and began scrutinising them. I found Jim some yards away, staring into his beer glass. “There are two men by the door,” I said, “reading brochures.”

“I see them,” said Jim.

“They’re only pretending to read brochures.”

“How do you know?” said Jim.

“You can tell by their demeanour,” I said.

“Here’s the plan,” said Jim. “We leave the bar together. When we get within earshot of the chasers, I say, ‘I’m gonna meet my Bilderberg contact at the Tiny Bar.’ You say, ‘Shhh.’ Say it urgently, as if you don’t want them to overhear. Feed them disinformation.”

“I’m not going to do that,” I said. Jim and I left the bar together.

“Jon,” said Jim loudly, “I’m gonna meet my secret Bilderberg contact at the Tiny Bar.”

I scowled, said nothing and marched ahead.

“Very good,” murmured Jim outside.

We split up. I walked down to the beach and found a seafood restaurant. I do not think I was followed there. When I returned some hours later to the bar of the Paris Hotel, Jim was drunker than any man I’ve ever seen.

He was surrounded by four Danish ladies and they were all singing Yes, We Have No Bananas.

“Jim,” I said, urgently, “are you still being followed?” I coughed. “Sorry, ladies,” I said.

“Excuse me, ladies,” said Jim, bowing graciously. He turned to me.

“So what happened?” I said.

“I went to the Tiny Bar,” he said. “They call it the Tiny Bar because it is a tiny bar.”

“And did they follow you there?”

“. . . We have string beans and onions/Cabbages and scallions . . .”

“I’m a superstitious old boy,” said Jim.

He paused. “Abe Lincoln was a good man. Shame he was an abolitionist. Well, I guess nobody’s perfect. I’ve lost my train of thought.”

“You went to the Tiny Bar,” I prompted.

“So, I’m a superstitious boy and I never sit with my back to the door. Don’t want to end up like old Abe Lincoln. But I didn’t want them to know, see, that I knew they were there.”

“And were they there?”

“I don’t know,” said Jim. “I had my back to the door. Ha ha ha ha ha!”

Jim nearly fell off his chair laughing.

“Jim,” I said, sternly, “when you left, were you followed?”

“Who’d want to follow an old boy like me?” said Jim. “The amount of pills they make me take for my plumbing, anyone would think I was FAG positive.”

“Jim!” I said, startled. “That’s a terrible thing to say.”

“I’m a Neanderthal,” said Jim. “Grrrrr.”

Early the next morning, a Do Not Disturb sign hung on Jim’s door, and sounds of typing echoed down the corridor.

A frosty atmosphere had developed between Jim and myself this past day or so. The tension was driving us apart. I was ready to sell Jim out to save my own skin, and I felt that Jim, invigorated by the chase, was grabbing my hand and jumping blindly into dangerous waters. We had an appointment with Paul Luckman, the editor of the tiny English-language Weekly News, the Algarve parish newspaper that had stuck its neck out and gone big on the Bilderberg story. Paul’s was the only newspaper in Portugal – indeed, the only newspaper in the world, as far as I could tell – that was reporting the Bilderberg story.

Paul is an ex-pat from England, 15 years an Algarve resident. He is not a journalist by trade. He runs a small telephone company. The Weekly News is a hobby for him, his wife, Madeline, and their two friends from church, Fred and Brendan. Paul told me he was perplexed that their parish journal had stumbled on to a world exclusive on this explosive, baffling story. “I do not consider myself one of the world’s greatest thinkers,” he said over the phone, “but it doesn’t take much to work out that this is something genuine. And no other newspaper will touch it. Nobody. The conversation dies as soon as you say the word Bilderberg. I mentioned it to an editor on the Daily Express yesterday, and he immediately changed the subject. I said, ‘Did you hear what I said?’ ‘Yes.’ ‘Do you know about Bilderberg?’ ‘I’ve, uh, heard of them.’ And that was it. The conversation died.”

“How did you hear about Bilderberg?” I asked him.

“From a little newspaper on the internet called the Spotlight,” he said. “Have you heard of them?”

“I’m actually here in Portugal with Big Jim Tucker,” I said.

“Oh!” he said. “He’s a hero. Bring him along.”

***

Paul has a little office in a modern glass building in central Lisbon where he conducts his telephone business. He’s a committed born-again Christian. Church posters decorate the walls. “I find myself out of my depth,” he said, twisting an elastic band around his fingers. “If what they’re up to is perfectly innocent, why don’t they say what’s going on? But they don’t. Not even a little bit. Not even a hint. Nothing.” Paul paused. “Maybe my head’s gone,” he said, “but the Book of Revelation speaks of a one-world order, one financial order, a one-world religion. There’ll be a sense of disorder, of children not respecting their parents, and then a very powerful group will form. So it does all fit together.”

“I know they’re bad guys,” said Jim, “and I hate them, but I don’t believe they’re satanist.”

“I believe that Paul’s not saying they’re satanist,” I said. “He’s saying they’re actually Satan.”

The next morning, Paul sent Fred and Brendan, his fellow Weekly News editors, to meet Jim and me outside the gates of the Caesar Park. This was the day Jim said the limousines and the helicopters would arrive. If any of us still had doubts, Jim said, if any of us still didn’t believe, today was the day we would realise that the world was nothing like we had been told it was, that it turned on a sinister axis. The four of us waited out in the heat. A Gypsy caravan trotted past, then a few hikers. An hour trundled slowly by, and we filled in the time with small talk. “So, Paul thinks Bilderberg represents the fulfilment of the Book of Revelation,” I said to Fred. He chuckled. “Well, that’s where Paul and I part company.” We both laughed.

“You see,” said Fred, “I believe that all the prophecies have already been fulfilled.” There was a small silence.

“Oh,” I said.

Another hour passed. We ran out of mineral water. We kicked the gravel.

“They’ll be here,” said Jim, but now even he seemed unsure. He wiped the sweat from his forehead with a silk handkerchief. Our shirts were soaked. We stopped talking to each other and just stood there. Portugal is not an eventful country. There is tourism and there is football and there are golfing tournaments. It was, then, all the more extraordinary that, at around four o’clock, many of the world’s most powerful people really did begin to roll past us in taxis and anonymous town cars. There was David Rockefeller, net worth $2.5 billion, chairman of the Chase Manhattan bank, huddled into the back of a local cab.

“Good afternoon, Mr Rockefeller,” murmured Jim. The gatekeeper bowed and lifted the gate. Rockefeller waved, and the taxi disappeared up the drive.

Then came Umberto Agnelli of Fiat, Italy’s de facto royal family, net worth $3.3bn, barely noticeable in the back seat of some old sedan. “Big Bilderberg family,” said Jim. He was trying to remain matter-of-fact, but pretty soon he was grinning broadly.

“Jim!” I said.

“Damn right, soldier,” he beamed. “Pretty overwhelming, huh?”

There was Vernon Jordan, Bill Clinton’s close friend, his unelected unofficial adviser and golfing partner – Vernon Jordan, who plucked the president from Arkansas obscurity and nurtured him to the White House, and who is widely credited with pulling strings to get James Wolfensohn his job as president of the World Bank.

There was James Wolfensohn, president of the World Bank. “Incredible,” murmured Fred. “Unbelievable.”

And there was Henry Kissinger, possibly the most powerful individual the postwar world has known: Dr Kissinger, who sanctioned the secret bombing of Cambodia and later won the Nobel Peace Prize, who revealed to the press his heart attack with the words, “Well, at least that proves I have a heart” – and here he was trundling up the drive of the Caesar Park in the back of an old Mercedes.

“I’ll tell you one thing, I bet you didn’t know about Henry Kissinger,” said Jim. “His accent is as American as mine. Creep up on him at a bar, as I once did, and whisper that you know exactly what he’s up to, and he’ll splutter and shout at you in an accent as American as Mom’s apple pie.”

I attempted, for a moment, to judge rationally whether there was any truth to this startling claim – whether Kissinger really had throughout his life adopted a fake European accent to camouflage his American one. But I couldn’t. My rationality had suffered a tremendous blow, and I now no longer knew what was possible and what was not.

The taxis kept coming. There were CEOs of pharmaceutical giants and tobacco companies and car manufacturers, the heads of banks from Europe and North America. Some, like Richard Holbrooke, America’s United Nations representative, gave us friendly smiles, which Jim returned with a glare of undisguised loathing.

“Who are these people?” said Fred. “Why does nobody want to know?”

“They’re the masters of the universe,” said Jim. “The rulers of the world. You know their names now.”

There was Conrad Black, the world’s third biggest media magnate, the owner of the Daily Telegraph and the Jerusalem Post and the Chicago Sun-Times and 40 Canadian dailies and 447 other newspapers around the world. Conrad Black, who, when asked what epitaph he would like, replied, “Just my name and dates. The more exalted a person, the less is written on their tombstone. Charles de Gaulle just has his name and dates, Winston Churchill has the same, Otto von Bismarck has only his last name, and Napoleon Bonaparte has only the letter ‘N’ with no dates at all. This was a man sure of his place in history, and now I felt that perhaps I understood why.”

An old bus cruised up the drive. I paid it little attention, assuming it was full of hotel workers. Only Brendan scrutinised the occupants. I glanced over. Brendan seemed frozen to the spot.

“Brendan?” I said.

“Brendan!” said Fred, sharply. “What is it?”

“I looked through the window,” he explained, finally, “and I focused on one person, and he was staring back at me. I was standing with my camera in hand, and this person . . . just stared.”

“What kind of stare was it?” I asked.

“It was a strange stare,” he said. “It was a different type of stare. Yes. He looked down at me. As if he was staring right through me.” There was a pause. “I couldn’t even lift my camera.”

“And who was it?” I asked.

Then Brendan said, softly, “It was Peter Mandelson.”

There was a long silence.

“Peter Mandelson?” I said.

“I’ve never seen a stare quite like it,” said Brendan.

“Who’s Peter Mandelson?” said Jim.

There was nothing left for us to do, so we got lunch. We lavished praise upon Big Jim, who grinned with satisfaction. He had, indeed, uncovered something extraordinary. Fred half-joked that Jim should win a Pulitzer, except Pulitzer was probably in Bilderberg’s hands. We went back to our hotels to freshen up, and after a while Jim called to ask, if I had a moment, would I mind meeting him in his room? There seemed to be something on Jim’s mind.

“We can only wonder what evil things they’re doing in there right now,” he said, lighting a cigarette.

“They’ve only just arrived,” I said, lighting one. too. “They’re probably showering.” There was a pause. “So what is it, Jim?” I said.

And then Jim dropped his bombshell – he was calling off the midnight penetration. “When I was at the Tiny Bar last night,” he explained, “I met this taxi driver. Local guy. Knew the terrain. I said I’d give him a hundred dollars to escort me through the undergrowth and up the drainpipes. ‘One hundred crisp American dollars,’ I said to him. ‘Buy the wife that red dress she’s always wanted.’ “

Jim paused to cough. He had a coughing fit. He lit a cigarette. I lit one, too.

“Anyway,” resumed Jim after he had drunk a glass of water, “the taxi driver called just now. He said his wife wasn’t going to let him go. Too dangerous, she said. She didn’t want him killed. Poor fool.”

Jim looked out of the window. “I’m sorry,” he said.

Jim gazed out at the traffic and the ocean beyond. He pulled on his cigarette. As I watched him, I considered the cancellation of the midnight penetration. Jim was never without a cigarette. He didn’t like to admit it, but his lungs were shot. His health was no longer a match for drainpipes and guard dogs and armed security. Bill Clinton’s best friend Vernon Jordan was there, 13 years a director of America’s second-largest cigarette manufacturer, RJR Nabisco. I was sure that it was Jim’s rattling, cigarette-induced emphysema that had put paid to his midnight penetration. I went back to my own room and lay on my bed. I drifted off for a while, and then I was woken by the telephone. It was Fred from the Weekly News. He said he had something of great importance to tell me. Could I meet him at once at his hotel?

“Just come as fast as you can,” said Fred. “I’ll meet you by the pool. And don’t bring your friend Jim Tucker.”

At the poolside of the Hotel California, Fred held a document. The document was screwed up in his hand and damp with sweat. Fred said that he had discovered something terrible in the hours that had passed since our lunch.

“Okay,” said Fred, “I returned to my hotel and I had a swim and then I went to my room and began surfing on the internet. And after a while I found this . . .”

Fred passed me the document. I uncreased it and laid it on the table.

Bilderberg material is fascist hoax!

Dear friends,

I am writing to you urgently to warn you about material being circulated about a ‘Bilderberg Conference’ due to take place in June in Portugal. The Washington-based journal Spotlight is quoted as a source of information on the Bilderberg Conference. Spotlight is published by the fascist Liberty Lobby. The purpose of the material appears to be to make people imagine there is a sinister Jewish conspiracy that is trying to dominate the world. You may find much information on Spotlight by contacting any major anti-fascist organization.

Against fascism and against capitalism, Lisa Taylor (International Solidarity with Workers in Russia).

“What do you think about that?” said Fred.

There was a long silence.

“Well,” I said. “I should tell you that the other night Jim told me it was a shame that Abraham Lincoln was an abolitionist.”

“Did he?” said Fred, clearly startled.

“But I can’t really think of anything else Jim said that might be construed as . . . oh, he did say that with the amount of pills they make him take for his plumbing, anyone would think he was . . .”

“We’re getting all our information from neo-Nazis?” interrupted Fred. “We’re publishing a newspaper all over Portugal and our sources are neo-Nazis?”

“You might be,” I said. “But that doesn’t mean . . .” I paused.

Fred looked out at the pool. Children were splashing around. It was a lovely day. He put his head in his hands.

“What,” he said, “have we got ourselves into?”

In my attempts to find out whether the world really was being secretly ruled from inside the Caesar Park golfing resort that June weekend, I later contacted dozens of Bilderberg members. And, of course, nobody returned my calls. Nobody even wrote back to decline my request and thank me for my letter, and these are people whose people always write back and decline requests – Peter Mandelson’s office, for instance – which is why I began to envisage these silences as startled ones.

I did manage to speak to David Rockefeller’s press secretary, who told me that Mr Rockefeller was thoroughly fed up with being called a 12ft lizard, a secret ruler of the world, a keeper of black helicopters that spy on anti-Bilderberg dissenters, and so on.

The Rockefeller office seemed to have an encyclopaedic knowledge of the conspiracy theories. They troubled Mr Rockefeller (his press man said). They made him wonder why some people are so scared and suspicious of him, in particular, and global think-tanks such as Bilderberg in general. Mr Rockefeller’s conclusion was that this was a battle between rational and irrational thought. Rational people favoured globalisation. Irrational people preferred nationalism. I asked him why he thought no Bilderberg member had returned my calls or answered my letters. “Well,” he shrugged, “I suppose it’s because they might want to be invited back.”

I persevered. I wanted the information.

I felt I deserved to have the information, and I simply couldn’t believe that there was certain information that I couldn’t get my hands on. It was driving me crazy. I learnt that being followed around by a man in dark glasses was tame in comparison with the indignities suffered by some of the few prying journalists who had travelled this road before me. In June 1998, a Scottish reporter tracked Bilderberg to the Turnberry Hotel in Ayrshire, and when he started asking questions he was promptly handcuffed by Strathclyde police and thrown into jail.

Bilderberg members continued to ignore my enquiries through the end of 1999 and into 2000. I continued dutifully to write to Bilderbergers, although I held out no hope of a breakthrough. And then, one Tuesday morning, the phone rang. It was the instantly recognisable voice of a Bilderberg founder member, for 30 years one of their inner circle, their steering committee, a Bilderberg agenda setter, a head-hunter – a secret ruler of the world himself, should you choose to believe the assorted militants I had spent the past five years with. It was Denis Healey.

“How can I help you?” he said.

“Well,” I said, “would you tell me what happens inside Bilderberg meetings?”

“Okay,” he said, cheerfully.

There was a silence.

“Why?” I said. “Nobody else will.”

“Because you asked me,” he said. Then he added, “I’m an old fart. Come on over.”

Once Lord Healey had agreed to talk to me – and I had circulated this information far and wide – other Bilderberg members became amenable, too (albeit on the condition of anonymity). These interviews enabled me to piece together the backstage mechanics of this most secret society.

So this is how it works. A tiny, shoe-string central office in Holland decides each year which country will host the next meeting. Each country has two steering committee members. (The British ones have included Lord Carrington, Denis Healey, Andrew Knight, the one-time editor of The Economist magazine, and Martin Taylor, the ex-CEO of Barclays Bank.)

They say that each country dreads their turn coming around, for they have to raise enough money to book an entire five-star hotel for four days (plus meals and transport and vast security – every packet of peas is opened and scrutinised, and so on). They call up Bilderberg-friendly global corporations, such as Xerox or Heinz or Fiat or Barclays or Nokia, which donate the hundreds of thousands of pounds needed. They do not accept unsolicited donations from non-Bilderberg corporations.

Nobody can buy their way into a Bilderberg meeting, although many corporations have tried. Then they decide who to invite – who seems to be a “Bilderberg person”. The notion of a Bilderberg person hasn’t changed since the earliest days, back in 1954, when the group was created by Denis Healey, Joseph Retinger, David Rockefeller and Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands (a former SS officer while he was a student – ironic that a former Nazi, albeit a low-ranking and half-hearted one, would help give birth to an organisation that so many would consider to be evidence of a Jewish conspiracy).

“First off,” said a steering committee member to me, “the invited guests must sing for their supper. They can’t just sit there like church mice. They are there to speak. I remember when I invited Margaret Thatcher back in ‘75. She wasn’t worldly. Well, she sat there for the first two days and didn’t say a thing. People started grumbling. A senator came up to me on the Friday night, Senator Mathias of Maryland. He said, ‘This lady you invited, she hasn’t said a word. You really ought to say something to her.’ So I had a quiet word with her at dinner. She was embarrassed. Well, she obviously thought about it overnight, because the next day she suddenly stood up and launched into a three-minute Thatcher special. I can’t remember the topic, but you can imagine. The room was stunned. Here’s something for your conspiracy theorists. As a result of that speech, David Rockefeller and Henry Kissinger and the other Americans fell in love with her. They brought her over to America, took her around in limousines, and introduced her to everyone.

“I remember when Clinton came in ‘91,” he added. “Vernon Jordan invited him along. He used it as a one-stop-shop. He went around glad-handing everyone. Nobody thought they were meeting the next president.” (Of course, Jim Tucker would contend that they all knew they were meeting the next president – for they huddled together that weekend and decided he would be the next president.) At times, I become nostalgic for when I knew nothing. There are so few mysteries left, and here I am, I presume, relegating Bilderberg to the dingy world of the known. The invited guests are not allowed to bring their wives, girlfriends or – on rarer occasions – their husbands or boyfriends. Their security officers cannot attend the conference and must have dinner in a separate hall. The guests are expressly asked not to give interviews to journalists. Rooms, refreshments, wine and cocktails before dinner are paid for by Bilderberg. Telephone, room service and laundry bills are paid for by the participants. There are two morning sessions and two afternoon sessions, except on the Saturday, when the sessions take place only in the evening so that the Bilderbergers can play golf. The seating plan is in alphabetical order. It is reversed each year. One year Umberto Agnelli, the chairman of Fiat, will sit at the front. The next year, Norbert Zimmermann, chairman of Berndorf, the Austrian cutlery and metalware manufacturer, will take his place. While furiously denying that they secretly ruled the world, my Bilderberg interviewees did admit to me that international affairs had, from time to time, been influenced by these sessions.

I asked for examples, and I was given one: “During the Falklands war, the British government’s request for international sanctions against Argentina fell on stony ground. But at a Bilderberg meeting in, I think, Denmark, David Owen stood up and gave the most fiery speech in favour of imposing them. Well, the speech changed a lot of minds. I’m sure that various foreign ministers went back to their respective countries and told their leaders what David Owen had said. And you know what? Sanctions were imposed.”

The man who told me this story added,

“I hope that gives you a flavour of what really does go on in Bilderberg meetings.”

This is how Denis Healey described a Bilderberg person to me: “To say we were striving for a one-world government is exaggerated, but not wholly unfair. Those of us in Bilderberg felt we couldn’t go on forever fighting one another for nothing and killing people and rendering millions homeless. So we felt that a single community throughout the world would be a good thing.”

He said, “Bilderberg is a way of bringing together politicians, industrialists, financiers and journalists. Politics should involve people who aren’t politicians. We make a point of getting along younger politicians who are obviously rising, to bring them together with financiers and industrialists who offer them wise words. It increases the chance of having a sensible global policy.”

“Does going help your career?” I asked.

“Oh yes,” he said. Then he added, “Your new understanding of the world will certainly help your career.”

“Which sounds like a conspiracy,” I said.

“Crap!” said Denis Healey. “Idiocy! Crap! I’ve never heard such crap! That isn’t a conspiracy! That is the world. It is the way things are done. And quite rightly so.”

He added, “But I will tell you this. If extremists and leaders of militant groups believe that Bilderberg is out to do them down, then they’re right. We are. We are against Islamic fundamentalism, for instance, because it’s against democracy.”

“Isn’t Bilderberg’s secrecy against democracy, too?” I asked.

“We aren’t secret,” he snapped. “We’re private. Nobody is going to speak freely if they’re going to be quoted by ambitious and prurient journalists like you who think it’ll help your career to attack something that you have no knowledge of.” I noticed a collection of photo albums on his mantelpiece. Denis Healey has always been a keen amateur photographer, so I asked him if he’d ever taken any pictures inside Bilderberg. “Oh yes,” he said. “Lots and lots of photographs.” I eyed the albums. Actually seeing the pictures, seeing the set-up, the faces, the mood – that would be something.

“Could I have a look at them?” I asked him. Lord Healey looked down at his lap. He thought about my request. He looked up again. “No,” he said. “Fuck off.”

© Jon Ronson, 2001. This is an edited extract from Them: Adventures With Extremists, by Jon Ronson, which will be published on April 6 by Picador, priced £16. Jon Ronson’s four-part television series, The Secret Rulers Of The World, begins on Channel 4 in May. Next week in Weekend: In the second extract from Jon Ronson’s new book, our reporter goes on the trail of David Icke, the former goalkeeper who became obsessed with lizards.

Masons Who Stare At Goats 03

THE PET GOAT, read by George Bush, 2001.09.11

A girl got a pet goat. She liked to go running with her pet goat. She played with her pet goat in her house. She played with her pet goat in her yard.

But the goat did some things that made the girl’s dad mad. The goat ate things. He ate cans and he ate canes. He ate pans and he ate panes. He even ate capes and caps.

One day her dad said, “That goat must go. He eats too many things.”

The girl said, “Dad, if you let the goat stay with us, I will see that he stops eating all those things.”

The dad said, “We will try it.”

So the goat stayed and the girl made him stop eating cans and canes and caps and capes.

But one day a car robber came to the girl’s house. He saw a big red car near the house and said, “I will steal that car.”

He ran to the car and started to open the door.

The girl and the goat were playing in the backyard. They did not see the car robber.

Masons Who Stare At Goats 06

Masons Who Stare At Goats 04

Masons Who Stare At Goats 05

Masons Who Stare At Goats 07

November 6, 2009

What Do You Believe?

November 6, 2009

If you are in Canada, DO NOT READ THIS! You are forbidden to do so by law.

VERBOTEN!

This letter from Ernst Zündel, former Liberal Party of Canada Prime Ministerial candidate, to his wife, is from his book, Setting the Records Straight: Letters from Cell # 7, which is listed as “Hate Literature” in Canada, and is accordingly seized by Canadian authorities.

Section 6.(1)(f)(2) and (4) of Memorandum D9-1-1 states: “Goods with some or all of the following characteristics may be subject to prohibition under tariff code 9956 as hate propaganda: (2) goods alleging that an identifiable group is manipulating media/trade/finance/politics/government to the detriment of society”

The Canadian Association for Free Expression is selling this work of Hate Propaganda for $20 (postage included) at:

CAFE,
Box 332,
Rexdale, ON.,
M9W 5L3,
Canada.
(“Send a cheque or money order, or e-mail us your VISA number and expiry date.”)

Canadian residents, do not buy it! It may be legal to do so, but the law is so unclear — why risk your liberty and freedom of speech by reading such a dangerous and Hate-filled book?

VERBOTEN!

If you are in Canada, DO NOT READ THIS!

Do not reproduce this and attempt to send it to Canada.

Ernst Zündel is considered so evil that Amnesty International refused to assist him even though the only reason he is in jail is for political/thought crimes.

Do not read this. It is a hate-filled, vicious hate-text, written by the most evil man on the planet. DO NOT READ!

VERBOTEN!

[To Ingrid Rimland. From Ernst Zundel in Mannheim prison, Germany]

August 28, 2005

My dearest Ingrid -

Today is a beautiful Sunday in Mannheim!  You would be amazed, my dear, with whom your husband rubs elbows in his new surroundings.  The range is utterly incredible!

Yesterday, the Fred N. look-alike asked me to lend him my jacket because it was a very cool morning.  I did, reluctantly.  I hate it when people borrow my coats, caps, boots, etc. — as they did in Toronto .  Anyway, he felt cold, so I lent him my jacket and made the rounds with an eighteen-year-old who looked more like a milquetoast 14-year-old kid — nice open face, blond, blue-eyed, but already smoking.  He looked bewildered and shell-shocked, so I decided that a bit of Dienst am Volk [service for the people] was called for.

Guess why he was in here?  He had damaged some cars, mirrors etc.  Why, I asked.  Oh, he had been drinking, was angry, enraged because his 17-year-old girl friend had chided him about something — and whammo!

Here he was in the slammer with murderers and was making his rounds with a 24-year-old unwholesome dope courier, callous and street-wise, defending the use of “the natural plant cannabis” versus “demon alcohol” — and the kid was all ears!

I hammered that creep’s arguments to shreds, leaving that blue-eyed boy visibly shocked.  I then separated that kid from this evil influence and worked the old Zundel Stare Magic.  In the end he agreed that it was stupid what he had done.  He certainly realized he was at a juncture in his life — he could attend this University of Crime , or he could decide that he had stared in the face of a worthless life, and that this German judge was giving him a bit of tough love and a reality check. Chances are that I had a bit of a good influence on a worthwhile German boy.

Meanwhile, the Fred N. look-alike was nowhere to be seen.  I spent the rest of an hour with a Black engineer from France, the son of a former Ambassador to the U.N., practicing my French.

My jacket was gone!  It turns out the wearer, whose father just died with six — six, Ingrid! — heart bypass operations behind him, age 93, and he, the son, at age 61 working himself up to his third heart attack, was wearing my jacket to the Krankenrevier [infirmary]. Luckily, he did not die this time, so the guard left him behind but brought my jacket back.

One wizened old guy, a German, smoking his guts out, pulled me aside, wanting to talk to me — belangloses Zeug [trivial stuff]!  Yesterday, another disheveled, wild-haired, unkempt guy proudly showed me his identity card because it was his birthday.  He, too, smoked his guts out!  He, too, was a German!

I make every effort to stay away from these people’s second hand smoke.  But I must say that I am horrified by that destructive habit of public smoking.  480 Germans already died each day in 1990, according to an article I read. That’s 175,200 Germans killed in one year.  In 15 years, that’s like the city of Toronto being wiped out!  [Imagine] the costs to society, and the loss of their knowledge, experience, and skills!

I pine for our mountain top with its fresh breeze and remember every second up there, the magic when the sun set and the stars came out.

Ernst Zündel
JVA-Mannheim
68169 Mannheim
Herzogenried Str. 111
Germany

VERBOTEN!

Do not write to Ernst Zündel. His lawyer was jailed for three years for defending him, so the German authorities, who claim universal jurisdiction, might track you down and come after you, and you too could end up in a German jail cell! Do not risk it.

VERBOTEN!


November 5, 2009

Israeli Prime Minister defends Palestinian Freedom Fighters: “Not Terrorists”

All commentary here is guaranteed 100% kosher. “Only KKKs” ( Kosher Kvetching Kommentators) is our temporary new motto at “What Do You Believe?”.

Kosher Symbol

Menachem Begin (KKK), Nobel Peace Prize Laureate:

Our enemies called us terrorists. People who were neither friends nor enemies, like the correspondents of the New York Herald-Tribune, also used this Latin name, either under the influence of British propaganda or out of habit …

The British Press and the British troops continued to call us by the name ["terrorist"] which, in their Generals’ opinion, suggested bravery on our part and fear on theirs. They called us ‘terrorists’ to the end. No doubt there was a psychological explanation for this. And yet, we were not terrorists … It all depends on who uses the term

The historical and linguistic origins of the political term ‘terror’ prove that it cannot be applied to a revolutionary war of liberation [and yet Begin's compatriot, the great Jewish hero Trotsky, in his "Defense of Terrorism," used the word "terrorism" precisely in that sense - ed.] … A revolution, or a revolutionary war, does not aim at instilling fear. Its object is to overthrow a regime and to set up a new regime in its place. [As Ahmadinejad quoted the Ayatollah as having predicted regarding Palestine - ed.] In a revolutionary war both sides use force. Tyranny is armed. Otherwise it would be liquidated overnight. Fighters for freedom must arm; otherwise they would be crushed overnight. Certainly the use of force also wakens fear. Tyrannous rulers begin to fear for their positions, or their lives, or both. And consequently they try to sow fear among those they rule. But the instilling of fear is not the aim in itself. The sole aim on the one side is the overthrow of armed tyranny; on the other side it is the perpetuation of that tyranny.

notwithstanding the enemy’s tremendous preponderance in physical strength, he it was who was defeated, not we. That is the law of history … What has a struggle for the dignity of man, against oppression and subjugation, to do with ‘terrorism?’ Our purpose, in fact, was precisely the reverse of ‘terrorism.’ The whole essence of our struggle was the determination to free our people of its chief affliction — fear.”

[Menachem Begin, The Revolt (Revised Edition), Nash Publishing, New York, 1977, p. 5-61.]

“We had to hate — as any nation worthy of the name must and always will hate — the foreigner rule, unjust and unjustifiable per se, foreign rule in the land of our ancestors, in our own country . We had to hate the barring of the gates of our own country to our own brethren, trampled and bleeding and crying out for help in a world morally deaf.

And, naturally, we had to hate all those who, equipped with modern arms and with the ancient machinery of the gallows, barred the way of our people to physical salvation, denied them the means of individual defence, frustrated their efforts for national independence, and ruthlessly withstood their attempts to regain their national honour and restore their self-respect.

Who will condemn the hatred of evil that springs from the love of what is good and just? Such hatred has been the driving force of progress in the world’s history — ‘not peace but a sword’ in the cause of mankind’s advancement. And in our case, such hate has been nothing more and nothing less than a manifestation of that highest human feeling: love. For if you Love freedom, you must hate Slavery; if you love your people, you cannot but hate the enemies that compass their destruction: if you love your country, you cannot but hate those who seek to annex it. Simply put: if you love your mother, would you not hate the man who sought to kill her: would you not hate him and fight him at the cost, if needs be, of your own life?

This is a fundamental human question in the violent and stormy world to today. Let every decent man search his soul and decently answer …

Truth compels [the author] to ask himself in the presence of his readers, Gentile readers and hostile readers, this testing question: If ever again your people should find themselves in a position like that in which they were when you had to ‘go underground,’ to fight, to become a hunted ‘rebel’ — in such circumstances would you again do what you did then?

The answer is definitely: ‘Yes.’”

[Menachem Begin, The Revolt (Revised Edition), Nash Publishing, New York, 1977, p. xxvi-xxvii.]

Menachem Begin

“The Jews now and then hatch a face which for Jewishness surpasses the caricatures of the entire anti-Semitic press. These Jew faces in which race leers and burns like some biologic disease are rather shocking to a mongrelized world. People dislike being reminded of their origins. They shudder a bit mystically at the sight of anyone who looks too much like a fish, a lizard, a chimpanzee or a Jew.”

~ Ben Hecht (KKK), A Jew in Love, 1931, p. 5.

Kosher Symbol

mug_shot_of_menachem_begin_1940

People like Menachem Begin are Nazis in their thoughts and their deeds.

~ Albert Einstein (KKK)

Mr Begin was found guilty of the murder of British soldiers [inc. if it matters, at least one patriotic British Jew], but for some reason was never punished. The British just forgot about it, I guess.

When Mr Begin refers to the “regime”, the “tyranny” etc. he means the British, who invaded and conquered Palestine as part of what the Zionist British Prime Minister David Lloyd George called “our contract with Jewry”. In return, Jewry delivered American blood to defeat Germany in the First Great Brother’s War.

In relation to the Palestinian Freedom Fighters who were labelled as “terrorists”, the great Zionist screenwriter and propagandist [excuse the redundancy], Ben Hecht (KKK), of the American Committee for a Free Palestine, wrote, in A Child of the Century [1985], about the American Jews’ bloodthirsty hatred for the British goyim for having invaded Palestine for Jewry and then not promptly handing it over to their Zionist masters:

“The play I’d written, A FLAG IS BORN [featuring Marlon Brando, who later -- as he noted in his autobiography -- regretted acting in such a piece of propaganda; see "comments" below], netted the Irgun nearly a million dollars. Bergson [a.k.a. Hillel Kook] bought a fairly large ‘ocean liner’ with the money. He put my name on its bows.” [p. 614]

[Hecht was asked to help raise millions of dollars more for Irgun, by drafting a newspaper ad]. “The ad carried the headline: ‘Letter to the Terrorists of Palestine.’ It read: ‘My Brave Friends. … The Jews of America are for you. You are their champions. You are the grin they wear. You are the feather in their hats. You are the first answer that makes sense — to the New World. Every time you blow up a British arsenal, or wreck a British jail, or send a British railroad sky high, or rob a British bank, or let go with your guns and bombs at the British betrayers and invaders of your homeland, the Jews of America make a little holiday in their hearts …” [p. 615]

“The ad appeared in a few days. Some fifteen newspapers printed it at their ‘usual advertising rates.’ Hundreds of other newspapers in the U.S., Mexico, South America and France ran the ad gratis. It appealed to them, apparently, as news.” [p. 617]

Kosher Symbol

November 5, 2009

TAKE THE SHOT!

US Government Propaganda: Swine Flu is Serious! Take the Shot. Trust Us, it’s 1976!

Link: Swine Flu 1976 & Propaganda

November 5, 2009

Czechs sold into bondage

If Klaus really believes that this marks the end of Czech sovereignty (which it does), then why didn’t he resign instead of signing it?

Historical Footnote: The Czechs obtained a guarantee that Germans who had been ethnically cleansed from Czechoslovakia after the Second War to End All Wars would be unable to sue for their damages, injuries, losses, and so on. Perhaps no group is compensated for injuries incurred during that war?

Czech President Vaclav Klaus on Tuesday reluctantly signed the Lisbon Treaty on the future of the European Union. The signature followed a Czech constitutional court ruling earlier in the day [2009.11.03] saying the treaty does not clash with the Czech constitution.

President Vaclav Klaus signed the Lisbon treaty after the Czech Constitutional Court issued its verdict this morning, Klaus himself said today.

The Czech Republic was the last EU country that did not ratified the treaty. With Klaus’s signature, the ratification has been completed.

The Constitutional Court today rejected a complaint against the treaty and said the treaty was in line with the country’s constitution.

Klaus said he expected this verdict and respected it though he did not agree with the court’s arguments.

On Thursday, the EU leaders agreed on an opt-out from the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, demanded by Klaus for Czechs. Klaus’s missing signature was the last obstacle to the implementation of the EU reform treaty.

November 5, 2009

Who is the Honorable Morton Isaac Abramowitz?

MIA is a patriot, having served his homeland for decades, with distinction.

MIA is a prominent human rights activist, and peace activist, having tirelessly worked for peace with numerous humanitarian organizations, such as:

  • The Soros Open Society Institute (Board of Trustees; with George Soros, Stewart Paperin, Laura Silber, Stephen Gutmann, Leon Botstein, David Rothman, John Simon, Jonathan Soros, etc.)
  • The Council of Foreign Relations (co-chair of the 1999 Independent Task Force on”Reconstructing the Balkans” ["the regions [sic] of Serbia, Kosovo, Montenegro, Bosnia, Bulgaria, Macedonia, Albania, Croatia, and Rumania”] — from MIA’s report: “The region will enjoy a lasting peace only if all its states leave the past behind and move decidedly to join the wider community.” — strange … I thought Yugoslavia was “a wider community” …; The Center for Preventive Action’s Independent Task Force on the Balkans 2010)
  • Human Rights Watch
  • The Century Foundation (Senior Fellow; with Kenneth Duberstein, John Podesta, David Aaron, Margaret Hamburg, Richard Kahlenberg, Daniel Levy, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Lewis Kaden, Nancy Soderberg, Tova Andrea Wang, etc.)
  • The Carnegie Endowment for International Peace (former president; with James C. Gaither, Bill Bradley, Jerry Cohen, Richard Debs, Susan Eisenhower, Leslie Gelb, Jamie Gorelick, Stephen Lewis, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Zanny Minton Beddoes, Strobe Talbott, Robert Kagan, Sherman Katz, Albert Keidel, Masha Lipman, Jessica Tuchman Mathews, Moisés Naím, David Rothkopf, Robert Kagan, etc.)
  • The U.S. State Department  (former Ambassador to Turkey; former assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research)
  • The National Endowment for Democracy (former director; with Wesley Clark, Evan Bayh, Francis Fukuyama, Lee H. Hamilton (911 Commission), Richard C. “Hal” Holbrooke, Michael Novak, Paula Dobriansky, etc)
  • The American Committee for Peace in Chechnya (Board of Directors; with William Kristol, Michael Ledeen, Elliott Abrams, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Eliot Cohen, Norman Podhoretz, Moishe Pripstein, Tatiana Yankelevich, Kenneth Adelman, Audrey L. Alstadt, Leonard R. Sussman, George Weigel, Caspar Weinberger, Joshua Muravchik, Richard Perle, Marshall Goldman, Alexander Haig, Irving Louis Horowitz, Robert Kagan, Max Kampelman, Richard Pipes, Robert Lieber, S. Frederick Starr, Richard Gere, Seymour Lipset, Peter Rosenblatt, Philip Siegelman, David Saperstein, Gary Schmitt, William Schneider, Alexey Semyonov, Andrew Sessler, Stephen Solarz, James Woolsey, Larry Diamond, Sandra Feldman, Geraldine Ferraro, Erwin Friedlander, Frank Gaffney, Douglas Ginsburg, Harry Kopp, Jan Nowak)
  • The International Crisis Group (for Bosnia and Kosovo; co-founder, and member of the Senior executive Committee; fellow ICG-ers: Chris Patten, Stephen Solarz, George Soros, Kenneth Adelman, Shlomo Ben-Ami, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Kim Campbell, Wesley Clark, Joschka Fischer, Leslie H. Gelb, etc.; MIA: “The sight of Slobodan Milosevic being tried for war crimes in the Hague may suggest that we have reached the end of history, Balkans-style.”)
  • The Balkan Action Committee (ex-Committee for the Present Danger; with Zbigniew Brzezinski, Elie Wiesel, Max Kampelman, Saul Bellow, Paul Wolfowitz, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Ron Lehman, John O’Sullivan, Richard Perle, Eugene Rostow, Donald Rumsfeld, Stephen Solarz, Helmut Sonnenfeldt, Geraldine Ferraro, Paula Dobriansky, Michael Lerner (Tikkun), etc.)
  • Freedom House (present and former Illuminaries: Peter Ackerman, Stuart Eizenstat, Walter Schloss, Max Kampelman, Bette Bao Lord, Kenneth Adelman, Bernard Aronson, Malcolm Steve Forbes, Theodore Forstmann, Henry Louis Gates, Jay Mazur, Andrew Nathan, Nina Rosenwald, David Rubenstein, Eleanor Roosevelt, Paula Dobriansky, James Woolsey, Kenneth Adelman, Max Kampelman, Peter Ackerman, Zbigniew Brzezinski, Stuart Eizenstat, Sandra Feldman, Malcolm Forbes, Samuel Huntington, Jeane Kirkpatrick, Anthony Lake, P.J. O’Rourke, Bill Richardson, etc.)
  • Intellibridge (with David J. Rothkopf, Anthony Lake, Richard C. “Hal” Holbrooke, Henry Kissinger, John Mark Deutch, Lawrence Korb, Joseph Samuel Nye, Jr., Stephen Solarz, Peter Tarnoff, etc.; subsumed into Eurasia)
  • The International Rescue Committee (with Madeleine Albright, Maurice R. Greenberg, Henry Kissinger, Tom Lantos, Elie Wiesel, Reynold Levy, David N. Pincus, Colin Powell, Bruce Ratner, Felix Rohatyn, Nancy Starr, Jonathan L. Wiesner, James Wolfensohn, Guy, Morton Hamburg, Jessica Seinfeld, Howard Jonas, Marvin Josephson, Alton Kastner, H. Peter Stern, W. Michael Blumenthal, William vanden Heuvel, Ronald Waldman, Leah Zell Wanger, Daniel Weiner, Randi Weingarten, etc.)
  • The National Interest (with Conrad Black, Irving Kristol, Helmut Sonnenfeldt, etc.)
  • The Synagogue of Satan

MIA delivered Stinger missiles to the Mujahidin in Afghanistan.

MIA represented the Albanian Islamic terrorist group UCK and Bosnia’s Iranian-U.S.-Saudi-backed militias against the Serbs in the former Yugoslavia.

MIA campaigns for the Chechens against Russia.

MIA arranged for Turkey to receive $6,000,000,000 “and unspecified additional billions in loans” from American tax-payers in exchange for the use of Turkish territory for the invasion of Iraq. MIA also guaranteed Turkey that America would deny Iraqi Kurds any national self-determination.

MIA is married to Sheppie Abramowitz, director of the Women’s Commission for Refugee Women and Children.

Diana Johnstone, Fool’s Crusade, Pluto Press, 2002, p. 9:

… Presidents come and go but the continuity of U.S. policy is ensured by a small elite of policy-makers who remain outside party politics – and often outside public view. An influential member of this foreign policy establishment is Morton Abramowitz, whose career has involved him with both the Afghan mujahidin and Kosovo Albanian rebels. In 1986, as assistant secretary of state for intelligence and research in the Reagan administration, Abramowitz helped arrange delivery of the Stinger missiles. The collapse of the Soviet Union obliged U.S. policy-makers to redefine the “threat” justifying foreign intervention. The “war on terrorism”, launched by President Reagan in the early 1980s, was suffering by the end of the decade from a dearth of active terrorists. As president of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in the early 1990s, Abramowitz headed a project to develop a new U.S. foreign policy for the post-Cold War era. Rather than simply identifying “threats”, especially at a time when few threats could be seen, a successful new policy needed to combine promotion of U.S. interests with proclamation of American “ideals”.

Abramowitz continued to act from behind the scenes as an eminence grise for [US Secretary of State] Albright. He helped found the high-level International Crisis Group, a chief policy designer fro Bosnia and Kosovo. He was omnipresent behind the scenes of the Kosovo drama, both in making policy and in shaping elite business, government, and media opinion. He acted as an advisor to the Kosovo Albanian delegation at the Rambouillet talks, whose programmed breakdown provided the pretext for NATO bombing.